Bible Versus Science

[kikomatsingmatos]

bible and science to

[Mang Ricky]

Mgka iba ang concern ng science sa concern ng bible. Pareho pwede magamit ang kaalaman mula science at bible para sa ikabubuti at ikauunlad ng mundo at sangkatauhan.

[Jj6969]

Sa super recorded na history ng egypt about pharaohs and family, kahit mga kabit lang ni Cleopatra may record. Bakit wala at all si Moses, na naging anak daw ng pharaoh sa legit history? Bible stories lang. Confirmation ba na BS yun?

[Elimer]

may nagsasabi recorded yung nagyari kay Moses and iba yung name na ginagamit nun kasi in egyptian language gamit niya unlike sa bible recorded in hebrew, and may nagsasabing possible na binura sa history ng egypt nun kasi disgrace yun sa linage, and marami proof din talaga may nagyayaring pagbura sa records in ancient egypt 

[JosephConrad]

Both tries to put meaning and reason in a non sensical universe that does not care if mankind survives or not!. 

[Solousi]

Science is a way to help understand the universe and apply that knowledge to make things better (ideally).

The bible is a guide to life based on early Christians on what it means to be morally good. It's not a book of facts but a book based on belief inspired by faith. The bible is not the sole source of truth and those that have studied it properly understand it. 

The more classic argument is actually faith vs. reason.

 At the end of the day, both can be misunderstood and misused if one is not careful. It's good practice to always step back once and a while and discern the choices these can influence and what it does to yourself and others.

 

[badweather]

Bible more real

[VivaForever2005]

Science is a way to help understand the universe and apply that knowledge to make things better (ideally).

The bible is a guide to life based on early Christians on what it means to be morally good. It's not a book of facts but a book based on belief inspired by faith. The bible is not the sole source of truth and those that have studied it properly understand it. 

The more classic argument is actually faith vs. reason.

 At the end of the day, both can be misunderstood and misused if one is not careful. It's good practice to always step back once and a while and discern the choices these can influence and what it does to yourself and others.

[HimuraButosay]

On 6/27/2024 at 10:39 PM, VivaForever2005 said:

Science is a way to help understand the universe and apply that knowledge to make things better (ideally).

The bible is a guide to life based on early Christians on what it means to be morally good. It's not a book of facts but a book based on belief inspired by faith. The bible is not the sole source of truth and those that have studied it properly understand it. 

The more classic argument is actually faith vs. reason.

 At the end of the day, both can be misunderstood and misused if one is not careful. It's good practice to always step back once and a while and discern the choices these can influence and what it does to yourself and others.

 

On 6/17/2024 at 10:56 AM, Solousi said:

Science is a way to help understand the universe and apply that knowledge to make things better (ideally).

The bible is a guide to life based on early Christians on what it means to be morally good. It's not a book of facts but a book based on belief inspired by faith. The bible is not the sole source of truth and those that have studied it properly understand it. 

The more classic argument is actually faith vs. reason.

 At the end of the day, both can be misunderstood and misused if one is not careful. It's good practice to always step back once and a while and discern the choices these can influence and what it does to yourself and others.

 

 

Aba.. talaga lang ah..  

 

Definite No for religion.

 

Better with science; that with faith, or religion.

 

Religion is decripit belief system sought to make uneducated feel behaved.

[Portico]

I'm not religious whatsoever, but I appreciate that some people need faith in their life. The two need not be mutually exclusive. It's more a matter of perspective. The ideas of God creating the world in seven days and the Earth being as old as written, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, doesn't mean it was designed with malicious intent. A week is just easier to conceptualize for the average person in ancient times rather than 100s of millions of years, which we only know now, because of advancements in science and technology. 

It's just important to remember to recognize that the Bible was written and rewritten constantly by man, not god, paired with the egos and motivations that are associated with them. It is important not to take the Bible literally as they were a product of the times they were written in. And not all of what it has to offer has stood the test of time, though it may have had practical relevance then.

While I lean heavily towards sciences, bad science exists as well. Poor methodology can negatively affect scientific progress, things we may have believed to be true for the longest time, can turn out to be wrong. Dinosaurs turned out to have had feathers, our galaxy is heliocentric not geocentric, etc. Thats also the beauty of science. It's allowed to be wrong sometimes and more importantly, allowed to be challenged and changed to better reflect our growth and understanding of our own place in the universe. 

It is important not to regard either blindly and dogmatically as there can be no progress without understanding.