Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

The Legal Side of Real Estate


rickyv

Recommended Posts

Happy New Year GM's !!!

 

I intend to purchase a house and lot this 2016 at around jan-feb. My issue here is that come April, I will be starting my annulment process. My question is this...

Can I put the title under the name of my 14 year old daughter so as not to include the property in the proceedings? If it is not possible, what other options would you suggest? I intend to give this to her as her inheritance when my time is up but I do not want my soon-to-be ex wife to benefit from this property in whatever way possible.

 

TIA

 

You should ask the seller if they will allow it to begin with, since your daughter is a minor.

Link to comment

Happy New Year GM's !!!

 

I intend to purchase a house and lot this 2016 at around jan-feb. My issue here is that come April, I will be starting my annulment process. My question is this...

Can I put the title under the name of my 14 year old daughter so as not to include the property in the proceedings? If it is not possible, what other options would you suggest? I intend to give this to her as her inheritance when my time is up but I do not want my soon-to-be ex wife to benefit from this property in whatever way possible.

 

TIA

Sir this only my opinion ( anyone can correct me if I am wrong), any property bought after marriage would belong to the conjugal property ninyong mag-asawa.

Now if binili mo ung house na kasal pa kayo you may DONATE that house to your minor child pero as parents kayo pa rin mag aadminister ng property. However donation would require that there be a NOTARIZED WRITTEN CONSENT ng BOTH SPOUSES para sa pag DONATE, sell, o mortgage ng Conjugal Property.

 

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

magkano po ang transfer tax, capital gains tax po? Ano po ba ang mga babayaran na tax pag bibili ng bahay? kasi 2nd owner ako so sa vendor lang hindi developer. 70sqm along masaito t 2M, excluding tax, ok na po ba yun o mhal?

 

tia.

Capital Gains Tax - 6%, Doc Stamps Tax - 1.5%, Transfer Tax - 0.75%.

 

Pero since ikaw ang buyer, ang tax na babayaran mo is usually is yung Doc Stamps Tax (1.5%), Transfer Tax (.75%) and pag-notarize ng mga docs mo lang. Ang Capital Gains Tax, sa account ng Seller yun pero ang ginagawa ng iba, pinapabayad ito sa buyer ng lupa, basta nag-agree ang buyer at seller sa ganung approach.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

i need help... or apparently a real estate lawyer who can solve my issue....

 

i inherited a lot, 1000 sqm... a developer contacted our family to show us plans for it. we haven't agreed to it then discovered they pushed through with the development eating up 400 sqm of it turning it into the village road. the lot actually looks ok but shouldn't we be entitled to something? when we asked the developer what our options are, di na sumagot. its been hard to communicate with them.

 

i had the area surveyed and the lot now criss crosses on a property of another developer at the back. creating a headache for us.

 

title is still in the name of my ancestors who already died, and now it becomes an issue on cap gains naman.

 

all real property taxes are up to date. help please, i'm looking into putting up my house there (i live in a small condo) but with all these issues, parang wait and see lahat ng parties. might as well sell it para walang headache. but the cap gains is an issue

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

i need help... or apparently a real estate lawyer who can solve my issue....

 

i inherited a lot, 1000 sqm... a developer contacted our family to show us plans for it. we haven't agreed to it then discovered they pushed through with the development eating up 400 sqm of it turning it into the village road. the lot actually looks ok but shouldn't we be entitled to something? when we asked the developer what our options are, di na sumagot. its been hard to communicate with them.

 

i had the area surveyed and the lot now criss crosses on a property of another developer at the back. creating a headache for us.

 

title is still in the name of my ancestors who already died, and now it becomes an issue on cap gains naman.

 

all real property taxes are up to date. help please, i'm looking into putting up my house there (i live in a small condo) but with all these issues, parang wait and see lahat ng parties. might as well sell it para walang headache. but the cap gains is an issue

First, do you wish to recover the area of your property encroached by the developer? If so, you have the option of filing an ejectment case against the developer. There are requisites for this kind of case.

 

Second, if it is inherited property, you need to settle the estate/ inheritance tax before you can have a title with your name on it. Question is, from your ancestors whose names are on the title, who are their heirs? The heirs would have to execute an Extra Judicial Settlement of Estate if there is no conflict among them. Or if you are the only heir, execute an Affidavit of Self Adjudication. You will have to settle the penalty charges of the BIR if your ancestor has died a long time ago.

 

Third, if you wish to sell instead the whole property to the developer, you may do so. You may execute an Extra Judicial Settlement of Estate With Sale.

 

Your case, from the information you provided, shouldn't be difficult and you have the upper hand actually. But you will definitely need a lawyer to help you out. You actually can demand a big amount considering the apparent bad faith committed by the developer.

 

Regards,

 

Atty. B.

Link to comment

Happy New Year GM's !!!

 

I intend to purchase a house and lot this 2016 at around jan-feb. My issue here is that come April, I will be starting my annulment process. My question is this...

Can I put the title under the name of my 14 year old daughter so as not to include the property in the proceedings? If it is not possible, what other options would you suggest? I intend to give this to her as her inheritance when my time is up but I do not want my soon-to-be ex wife to benefit from this property in whatever way possible.

 

TIA

Being a minor, your daughter cannot sign the deed of sale, so, therefore, you will be the one signing for her. I would suppose that the seller wouldn't have objections to or refuse your proposal considering he will be earning from the sale. He wouldn't have any legal issue with it, too. If you will be signing the deed of sale, what might appear in the title is your name "in trust for" your daughter. That is so because the name to be placed on the title would follow what is indicated in the deed of sale.

 

True, the property may not be declared as among the properties you and your spouse will have to settle in the annulment proceedings. BUT, if she finds out, if I were her lawyer, I would still include it in the settlement by alleging that the money used in the purchase of the property is conjugal funds. Remember everything acquired during the time of marriage belongs to both spouses, and that includes money. Of course, your spouse might think also not to meddle with the property anymore considering it is for the benefit of your child. But then...di ba?

 

And if you're already dead, necessarily your soon-to-be-ex will still be the guardian of the child particularly overseeing the property for her benefit until the time that she reaches the age of majority. Here's the scenario worth considering, you're already dead, your daughter is still a minor, your ex-spouse administers the property, she can petition the court for authority to sell the property and claim that the proceeds will be used for the needs of your daughter, like education. Sa ilalim ng lupa, ang magagawa mo lang eh, wala..patay ka na eh.

 

Your option is to make a will. State in the will that the property will be solely for your daughter and that it will not be sold except by her when she reaches 18.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Good day!

 

We have recently moved in to an apartment that is much bigger than our previous residence. Against my better judgement I agreed to take in a bedspacer. He took one of the two spare rooms that are not occupied and paid for the required one month deposit and advance. I gave him an ackowledgement receipt and was preparing a lease agreement when he suddenly got a "job" elsewhere which necessitated moving out soon. We never agreed to a short term stay and while we had no contract yet, he said that he wanted to stay till at least December of this year.

 

While incensed, I tried to be reasonable and offered that we pay back his deposit as soon as there is another tenant. He is insisting that we pay him back in a week regardless of whether or not we find a tenant right away, which I find appalling. I have perused RA 9161 and RA 9653 to find out what our recourse may be (said tenant claims his father is a lawyer), and found no specific provisions that cover buyers remorse. I would like to know the amount of time landlords have to pay back deposits by tenants who suddenly changed their minds. If any lawyers or expert landlords here can provide advise, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks.

 

 

PS

 

IN light of this development, I am leaning towards not accepting tenants at all, if I can avoid it. However, I need at least 10 days to get the money back out. Do I have that long? Thanks again.

Link to comment

Good day!

 

We have recently moved in to an apartment that is much bigger than our previous residence. Against my better judgement I agreed to take in a bedspacer. He took one of the two spare rooms that are not occupied and paid for the required one month deposit and advance. I gave him an ackowledgement receipt and was preparing a lease agreement when he suddenly got a "job" elsewhere which necessitated moving out soon. We never agreed to a short term stay and while we had no contract yet, he said that he wanted to stay till at least December of this year.

 

While incensed, I tried to be reasonable and offered that we pay back his deposit as soon as there is another tenant. He is insisting that we pay him back in a week regardless of whether or not we find a tenant right away, which I find appalling. I have perused RA 9161 and RA 9653 to find out what our recourse may be (said tenant claims his father is a lawyer), and found no specific provisions that cover buyers remorse. I would like to know the amount of time landlords have to pay back deposits by tenants who suddenly changed their minds. If any lawyers or expert landlords here can provide advise, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks.

 

 

PS

 

IN light of this development, I am leaning towards not accepting tenants at all, if I can avoid it. However, I need at least 10 days to get the money back out. Do I have that long? Thanks again.

You must pay him back. But there is no law as far as I know that says how long. That's what a signed contract is for. Since you don't have a contract, and you need at least 10 days, then I think 10 days is fine. He or his dad can report you, it's their right to do so, but that process would take longer than 10 days. So it's better for him to just wait. He's being such a baby, it's only 3 fcuking days!

 

And don't be discouraged. Not all tenants are asshats. But next time, no signed contract, no move in.

Link to comment

Maters, what is the penalty for late transfer of title? I bought a condo unit a few years ago and forgot to have the title transferred to my name from the developer. Thanks in advance for the information.

There's no penalty per se. The problem is the value of your property may have already increased from the time you purchased it. And so if you transfer it now, you will be paying tax based on a higher valuation.

Link to comment

You must pay him back. But there is no law as far as I know that says how long. That's what a signed contract is for. Since you don't have a contract, and you need at least 10 days, then I think 10 days is fine. He or his dad can report you, it's their right to do so, but that process would take longer than 10 days. So it's better for him to just wait. He's being such a baby, it's only 3 fcuking days!

 

And don't be discouraged. Not all tenants are asshats. But next time, no signed contract, no move in.

 

 

Thank you, for your response, Camus.

Link to comment

There's no penalty per se. The problem is the value of your property may have already increased from the time you purchased it. And so if you transfer it now, you will be paying tax based on a higher valuation.

By the way, my previous reply only applies if you haven't yet notarized the deed of sale. If deed of sale is already notarized then you need to pay taxes on it within 60 days. Penalty is surcharge 25% and interest 2% per month.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...