Cal! Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 (edited) Btw, as for the draft change kahit ano sakin.. Pero for the sake of voting, I vote No.. Para maiba lang.. hehe.. Edited October 15, 2006 by Cal! Quote Link to comment
launchpad Posted October 15, 2006 Share Posted October 15, 2006 so what does the others have to say, grabe this is not going to be an easy league and to draft. Quote Link to comment
gwapogi Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 so what does the others have to say, grabe this is not going to be an easy league and to draft. that's what makes this league unique & cool!!! Quote Link to comment
consiglieri Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 do i still need to vote for the time change if yes then ok lang sa kin... i also agree with the 1 C 2 UTIl Quote Link to comment
agentjackbauer Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 do i still need to vote for the time change if yes then ok lang sa kin... i also agree with the 1 C 2 UTIl Re change of draft time, you now have 7 votes josh. Just one more. Re roster spots, I have had a change of mind. I am now more inclined to reduce the C spot to 1 (instead of 2). The bench spots will still be 3 and the util spots 2. Quote Link to comment
cheeselogger Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 I don't mind having a thin FA pool as we are still trying to discourage the add/drop kung-fu right? Quote Link to comment
launchpad Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 I don't mind having a thin FA pool as we are still trying to discourage the add/drop kung-fu right? i think its more of protecting the integrity of the league, there will be times you have injuries or due to schedule conflict you would want to change your players, but if a thin FA pool what would it do. add and drop i think can be controlled by the waiver rule, always remember the end of the FA pool list are mostly 1 to 2 dimensional players only. Quote Link to comment
teio Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 ang hirap gawin ng ploy na ganyan dito sa fantasy nba since may game every other day... sa fantasy mlb kasi hindi araw-araw na naglalaro ang isang starting pitcher... the main challenge is whether to gamble or not on players who are hot in the first few games... minsan kasi hanggang dun na lang sila at nagfe-fade away... with the total of teams sa league... hindi natin maiiwasan na ang team natin ay mahaluan ng maraming one-dimensional players...I don't mind having a thin FA pool as we are still trying to discourage the add/drop kung-fu right? Quote Link to comment
gwapogi Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 IMO, stick with the usual formula... the 2 C scenario would still be good, as most players (and most of us would pick) have multiple positions / C eligibility... ...i say, give 3 util spots and 2 BN spot... everything else stays the same... Quote Link to comment
teio Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 better have one center lang... i'm sure there will be a short supply of centers... Quote Link to comment
Cal! Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 i go for 1 center lang. since all positions have 1 each lang din naman. then retain the others na. Quote Link to comment
bubuy Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 I don't mind having a thin FA pool as we are still trying to discourage the add/drop kung-fu right?that can be countered by reducing the max moves from 75 to 65. :thumbsupsmiley: Quote Link to comment
gwapogi Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 that can be countered by reducing the max moves from 75 to 65. :thumbsupsmiley: oo nga... potek, last year, nakakainis... yng add / drop kung-fu (pauso yata namin ni bubuy/g0g yng term na yan) na yan ang mejo nakasira sa diskarte ng ibang GM's... ok... agree with 1 C... but 3 utils & 2 BN... ...and, 60 MAX roster moves... Quote Link to comment
bubuy Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 oo nga... potek, last year, nakakainis... yng add / drop kung-fu (pauso yata namin ni bubuy/g0g yng term na yan) na yan ang mejo nakasira sa diskarte ng ibang GM's... ok... agree with 1 C... but 3 utils & 2 BN... ...and, 60 MAX roster moves...ikaw nagpauso nyan term na yan eh. wehehehe. well, for my part naman, i understand.. lalo na kung madami talaga injuries at long term.. tsaka that was an available tactic last year, so if it is available why not use it? mahihirapan na ang kukuha kay gasol this year because of the limited # of players, player roster at max moves.. :evil: january pa balik nya di ba? parang narinig ko na yan january na yan last year eh. 3 UTIL + 2 BN? di ba mas ok kung 2 UTIL + 3 BN? Quote Link to comment
consiglieri Posted October 16, 2006 Share Posted October 16, 2006 id go with 2 UTIL and 3 Bench...walang IL sa Fantasy NBA eh.. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.