Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Recommended Posts

Sa PAL international parekoy. Terminal 2 if I am not mistaken. Imbes masaya sana yung pagsalubong, talagang init na init ulo ko at ulo ng nanay ko. Text na ng text sakin habang nasa loob, nagbanta pa na wo-walk out na sya :lol:. And I kept saying "Wala po akong magagawa hindi ko ito kasalanan". Masama pa nito, I came from a winter weather. So isipin mo na lang suot ko, tapos yung lobby sobrang humid at init. Kaya tuloy nung finally nakalabas na, ni hindi ko mayakap at mahalikan nanay ko sa sobrang inis nya. It would take the entire ride home bago lumamig pareho ulo namin.

 

Anyway, I am no expert of the law or legislation, pero di ko talaga maintindihan bakit sobrang mahal ang kelangan singilin pag gagamit ng airport sa manila. Dagdag sila ng dagdag ng terminal fee, wala naman tayo masyadong nakikitang significiant na amenities nakukuha. Kung hindi mo binili sa pinas ticket mo, bayad ka pa ng travel tax pag paalis ka na. Pwera pa terminal fee. WTF? Eh bakit naman sa ibang bansa, pag may stop over ka, hindi naman sinisingil pasahero ng terminal fee. Lahat kasama na sa ticket mo. Sa Seol or Hongkong, ang gaganda ng relaxation facilities nila. Sa Seol may libreng shower ka pa! Ayusin talaga nila ito dapat. Kasi ito yung first and last impression na makukuha ng bumibisita sa atin eh.

Maybe if the airport tax were actually used to improve airport facilities, we'd have a half decent airport. Problem is, NAIA is a microcosm of our government. Ninanakaw lang ang airport tax ng iilan na corrupt officials.

 

Since that's the case, it's better if the airport tax is indeed removed. Passengers do not benefit at all from modern amenities despite the airport tax.

Link to comment

Maybe if the airport tax were actually used to improve airport facilities, we'd have a half decent airport. Problem is, NAIA is a microcosm of our government. Ninanakaw lang ang airport tax ng iilan na corrupt officials.

 

Since that's the case, it's better if the airport tax is indeed removed. Passengers do not benefit at all from modern amenities despite the airport tax.

 

Like I said, yan ang hirap sa Pinas, dami daming pinagkukunan ng buwis hindi naman ginagastos ng tama.

 

Sa ibang bansa, sobrang taas ng income tax, pero naman wala ka ng aalalahanin pagkatapos. Pag nagkasakit ka, pakita mo lang ID mo, yung pagaaral ng mga anak mo ok na, matibag lang konti kalsada aayusin kaagad

Link to comment

Like I said, yan ang hirap sa Pinas, dami daming pinagkukunan ng buwis hindi naman ginagastos ng tama.

 

Sa ibang bansa, sobrang taas ng income tax, pero naman wala ka ng aalalahanin pagkatapos. Pag nagkasakit ka, pakita mo lang ID mo, yung pagaaral ng mga anak mo ok na, matibag lang konti kalsada aayusin kaagad

That's because taxes are used by the government to provide services to its citizens. Unlike over here where taxes are paid by citizens like they were slaves to the government which doesn't use the tax to uplift the people.

 

Taxes are more like a tribute in the Philippines. You want to be a Filipino citizen, you must pay tribute to the Philippine government even if you earn your income in the United States. Clear case in point: Manny Pacquiao.

 

Pacquiao gives more to his constituents than the Philippine government ever will.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment

How about a law where an incoming president or even an incumbent president cannot pardon those convicted of plunder unless the convicted plunderer has served a minimum of 20 years in prison.

 

That way, the president cannot be blamed for being heartless. Since plunder carries a life sentence, the plunderer is already getting a good deal with a 20 year sentence.

 

We won't have a situation where a plunderer like Erap is pardoned after serving less than 10 years. That's a slap on the wrist compared to a life sentence.

 

And of course the imprisonment should take place at a real penitentiary. No house arrest, no hospital arrest, no special privileges, etc. The convicted plunderer shouldn't be shown any mercy such as what GMA did to ERAP.

 

A no-nonsense type incarceration will make even those at the top think twice before stealing from the Filipino people again.

Link to comment

I 'd like to see a law enacted which would grant incentives on the sale of hybrid cars such as removing or at least reducing the amount of taxes imposed on the sale of such cars. This will encourage people to purchase hybrid cars which will definitely have a positive impact insofar as reducing air pollution is concerned. Greater use of hybrid cars will also help conserve dollar reserves.

 

In fact, any technology which will minimize reliance on fossil fuels should be granted tax incentives.

 

Right now, demand for hybrid cars is quite low because they are so expensive.

 

 

 

Link to comment

Can we not punish senators for abusing privilege speeches?

 

Sobrang nagiging kakatawa ang senado natin tuwing nagsasalita si Bobong Revilla. Ano bang akala nya? Award ceremony ng famas ang pinuntahan nya? Dapat sa the buzz nya sinabi mga sinatsat nya sa sendao

Claro M. Recto, Pepe Diokno, Lorenzo Tanada, and other renowned members of the Philippine Senate must be turning in their graves with that pathetic display of tacky show-biz hoopla. Gone are the glory days of the Philippine Senate. How low have our legislators stooped. No wonder the Philippines is so f#&ked up.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment

Claro M. Recto, Pepe Diokno, Lorenzo Tanada, and other renowned members of the Philippine Senate must be turning in their graves with that pathetic display of tacky show-biz hoopla. Gone are the glory days of the Philippine Senate. How low have our legislators stooped. No wonder the Philippines is so f#&ked up.

 

Clearly this is one privilege of senators that's being abused. Hindi na yata sila marunong maging responsable sa sinasabi nila. Ni hindi na nga alam kung ano ang dapat nilang sinasabi dun. Don't even start with "this is democracy" Bullshit. This is one reason why our democracy is a big joke. Basta makasalita lang papasalitain. From tolerating plagiarism, to showbiz tirades, aba hindi na ako magugulat kung isang araw pwede na rin mangampanya para sa susunod na eleksyon ang mga senador natin gamit ang privilege speech

Link to comment

Clearly this is one privilege of senators that's being abused. Hindi na yata sila marunong maging responsable sa sinasabi nila. Ni hindi na nga alam kung ano ang dapat nilang sinasabi dun. Don't even start with "this is democracy" Bullshit. This is one reason why our democracy is a big joke. Basta makasalita lang papasalitain. From tolerating plagiarism, to showbiz tirades, aba hindi na ako magugulat kung isang araw pwede na rin mangampanya para sa susunod na eleksyon ang mga senador natin gamit ang privilege speech

Even supposedly intelligent senators like Miriam "Brenda" Santiago aren't immune from delivering inane privilege speeches in her bid to be "entertaining." Personally, I think her privilege speeches aren't entertaining but disgusting to say the least.

Link to comment

It would be nice if we had a law or ordinance that will penalize drivers who do not yield to pedestrians at crosswalks/pedestrian lanes. Also we should have a law which does not penalize drivers with reckless imprudence resulting in homicide/serious physical injuries if the driver happens to run over a person in a highway where people are not supposed to cross. Case in point is Commonwealth Avenue where many people are run over after these people attempt to cross the highway. There are pedestrian overpasses for these people to cross.

 

A driver who accidentally runs over a jaw walker shouldn't be liable for his death or injury. He obviously wasn't negligent or reckless. The jay walker was.

 

 

 

Link to comment

It would be nice if we had a law or ordinance that will penalize drivers who do not yield to pedestrians at crosswalks/pedestrian lanes. Also we should have a law which does not penalize drivers with reckless imprudence resulting in homicide/serious physical injuries if the driver happens to run over a person in a highway where people are not supposed to cross. Case in point is Commonwealth Avenue where many people are run over after these people attempt to cross the highway. There are pedestrian overpasses for these people to cross.

 

A driver who accidentally runs over a jaw walker shouldn't be liable for his death or injury. He obviously wasn't negligent or reckless. The jay walker was.

Many years ago, I saw a man sprawled dead along EDSA after he was run over by a car. The MRT hadn't been built yet. The man was apparently trying to cross from the northbound lane of EDSA to the south bound lane when he was struck by the vehicle.

 

Sad thing is, just 50 meters away, there was a pedestrian overpass. If he had taken that overpass instead of trying to cross EDSA he might still be alive today.

 

 

 

Link to comment

A law is needed to prevent people from running for a political position while they are in jail awaiting trial for a serious crime.

Also, a law disqualifying convicts from running for a government position. Joseph Estrada, being a convicted plunderer wouldn't be mayor of Manila today if such a law had been enacted.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...