sandy51 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Propose an amendment to the Constitution kaya? Remove COA. Bilhan lang pala nang kotse from DAP, allowed na ang DAP. Remove the Ombudsman and Sandiganbayan. Sa mga kalaban lang pala mainit. Comelec din kaya? simpleng due dilligence lang nang residency ni Poe, mukang hindi pa nagawa otherwise, this issue would have been settled a long time ago. These are supposed to be Constitutional bodies so that they would be independent. But through all these years, have we really seen this? Quote Link to comment
daphne loves derby Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 1. Mandatory Hospitals in every district of all Provinces2. Free 2 year course education on all State Colleges and Universities NATIONWIDE3. Early retirement change from 60 to 50yrs old4. Free Wifi all over the Philippines5. Free SMS on all Networks Quote Link to comment
sonnyt111 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 1. Mandatory Hospitals in every district of all Provinces2. Free 2 year course education on all State Colleges and Universities NATIONWIDE The problem here is no money, no honey. Money is going into the pockets of crooked officials. Quote Link to comment
daphne loves derby Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 The problem here is no money, no honey. Money is going into the pockets of crooked officials. Correct! thats why we need it to be a law para ma obliga silang ipatayo at ipatupad ito para mas marami ang totoong makinabang Quote Link to comment
One Size Fits All Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Lessen the 30-32% tax, other countries are surviving naman kahit 10-12% lang tax ng mga tax payers.. Quote Link to comment
sonnyt111 Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 (edited) restoration of Death Penalty i agree with this law, but focus more on the drug trafficking and rape. I also agree with this law. But I think before the death penalty is restored, there is a need to improve forensics science in the country. Nobody should ever be put to death on the mere word of a witness. The death sentence should only be used if science shows that a person is actually guilty of the heinous crime without a shadow of a doubt. Testimonial evidence should only be used to corroborate the forensics evidence. Example: DNA of the accused is found in the weapon and in the place where the victim was discovered dead. Accused cannot explain how his DNA was found on the weapon, on the dead person, and the place where the victim was discovered dead. There is a need to preserve the integrity of the DNA and other forensics evidence to prevent contamination and cross contamination. There is a need to preserve the DNA so it does not degrade. There is need to train doctors and scientists on the latest developments on DNA technology which includes the use of mitochondrial DNA as well as touch DNA. There is need to procure the necessary equipment, computers, data bases such as CODIS and AFIS and establish crime laboratories with the latest forensics technology which can do tool mark analysis, fiber and other trace evidence analysis, analyze the presence of human blood through luminol and other chemicals which can detect microscopic blood particles. There is a need to improve toxicology protocols, introduce entomology to assist scientists determine time of death of the victim, and so on. We must modernize crime fighting. Otherwise, we risk putting to death innocent people. Edited July 24, 2015 by sonnyt111 Quote Link to comment
Edmund Dantes Posted July 24, 2015 Share Posted July 24, 2015 Sana payagan naman gumamit ng lethal force na ang mga pulis pag nagpapaalis ng mga squatter. Kung legal naman at nasa proseso, tapos nanglalaban mga residente, payagan na sila dapat mamaril. Unang una, kung me mga baril din naman ang mga residente, papuputukan din naman sila sigurado. At nakakamatay din kaya mabato ng bote, pilbaks o bato sa ulo mo. Tsaka wala rin bang human rights ang mga pulis natin? SIla nga hirap na hirap makakuha ng housing loan. Tapos yung isang loko sa squatter na kilalang snatcher na mababaril magrereklamo ng human rights? Quote Link to comment
MsDebauchery Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 I think I heard this from Mo Twister. Children of elected officials should be made to go to public schools. Quote Link to comment
Shadow Minister Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 Propose an amendment to the Constitution kaya? Remove COA. Bilhan lang pala nang kotse from DAP, allowed na ang DAP. Remove the Ombudsman and Sandiganbayan. Sa mga kalaban lang pala mainit. Comelec din kaya? simpleng due dilligence lang nang residency ni Poe, mukang hindi pa nagawa otherwise, this issue would have been settled a long time ago. These are supposed to be Constitutional bodies so that they would be independent. But through all these years, have we really seen this? Ako din, not really a law dahil it requires constitutional reform, more on policy - remove the 60/40 limits sa constitution with regards to foreign corporate ownership! Napakababa ng FDI natin relative to our ASEAN neighbors (who are more open to foreign investments) and consequently, napakakonti ng job opportunities dito. Hindi pa ba tayo nagtataka na yung best and brightest natin nagpupunta sa Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, China, and ngayon Vietnam, dahil madaming well-paid jobs there? Let's be practical - mapapakain tayo ng trabaho, pero yung ideological principles/bullshit ng iilan, hindi. Tayo lang po ang may foreign ownership limits na naka-enshrine sa constitution sa ASEAN at karatig na lugar. It's really ridiculous. Quote Link to comment
maxiev Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 Lessen the 30-32% tax, other countries are surviving naman kahit 10-12% lang tax ng mga tax payers..I like this!! I hope that the next president kick out Kim Henares as BIR Commissioner. Sana payagan naman gumamit ng lethal force na ang mga pulis pag nagpapaalis ng mga squatter. Kung legal naman at nasa proseso, tapos nanglalaban mga residente, payagan na sila dapat mamaril. Unang una, kung me mga baril din naman ang mga residente, papuputukan din naman sila sigurado. At nakakamatay din kaya mabato ng bote, pilbaks o bato sa ulo mo. Tsaka wala rin bang human rights ang mga pulis natin? SIla nga hirap na hirap makakuha ng housing loan. Tapos yung isang loko sa squatter na kilalang snatcher na mababaril magrereklamo ng human rights?I like this one too!! Quote Link to comment
MsDebauchery Posted July 29, 2015 Share Posted July 29, 2015 Sana payagan naman gumamit ng lethal force na ang mga pulis pag nagpapaalis ng mga squatter. Kung legal naman at nasa proseso, tapos nanglalaban mga residente, payagan na sila dapat mamaril. Unang una, kung me mga baril din naman ang mga residente, papuputukan din naman sila sigurado. At nakakamatay din kaya mabato ng bote, pilbaks o bato sa ulo mo. Tsaka wala rin bang human rights ang mga pulis natin? SIla nga hirap na hirap makakuha ng housing loan. Tapos yung isang loko sa squatter na kilalang snatcher na mababaril magrereklamo ng human rights?Yea, let's just shoot people who break the law. Who needs courts, mediation, and prisons anyway. Murica! Quote Link to comment
sandy51 Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 Sana may law which would limit Presidential appointments. Pag walang Department, wla din dapat Secretary. Ang gastos and ang gulo. And ano ba yan? Ultimo Assistant Secretary appointed by the President. Eh how will the Dept Secretary run his shop when his direct subordinates are not under his control? Tapos pag nagkamali pang mag post after a Vietnam state visit pasensya na lang kasi bata pa. Eh kung bata pa, bakit ginawang Assistant Secretary? Quote Link to comment
Edmund Dantes Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 Yea, let's just shoot people who break the law. Who needs courts, mediation, and prisons anyway. Murica! Hmmmm sarcasm po ba ito? In case.... what I am saying is, policemen in this kind of situation should be allowed to defend themselves with lethal force. I am not saying na mangsalvage sila ng mga kriminal. Walang magagawa ang helmet at wartercannon kung sinasalubong sila ng mga bato, bote, pilbaks, at sumpak. Kung me mga kriminal dyan na me baril, ginagamit din nila yan sa demolition party. Bakit? ang mga squatter lang ba me karapatan na dapat igalang? Kung aalis sila mahusay, walang problema. Pero kung manlalaban sila at mangbabato, fire off a warning shot. Kung talagang di tumigil then payagan ang mga pulis gamitin baril nila Quote Link to comment
garisky Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Set Maximum 2 years limit to hear a case in every court. Yung impeachment court na resolve (daw) ilang buwan lang for a number of cases filed. Quote Link to comment
chris_ewans40 Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 1. sana magkaroon ng batas na ang pwede lang bumoto ay yung nagbabayad ng income tax! atleast until such time na maayos na ang bansa natin at wala ng mga bobotante.2. pag wala sa tamang tawiran, dapat wala sagutin ang driver ng sasakyan na nakasagasa! at ipagbawal na ang motor sa EDSA at C5, Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.