Defendants ung nakapossess ng property and sya ung complained party or defendant. Kapag nailabas na ung finality or entry of judgment can they use the evidences presented during the trial again sa petition for relief of judgement rule 38. Example exhibit A which has been presented and heard during actual trial. And they are not part of the document.
Questions
1) can they still use the evidences sa formal offer ng plaintiffs for this rule 38 or need new evidence? Since napagusapan na ung mga evidences during regular trial can they dig the previous evidences and say ' ay may nakita kami na kaduda duda.' when their chance to check the docs has lapsed?
2) they are not part of the documents since illegal settlers sila their documents points to another lot.
Tia