Jump to content

2003rdb

[03] MEMBER
  • Posts

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 2003rdb

  1. Hi, Kat. Having been a "continuing" rape victim in your youth, I'm glad to note that you seem to have developed a healthy sex life and outlook towards it during your adulthood. How did you get out of the trauma? Women made of less stuff would have been unable to bounce back. Care to share?

  2. "Harry Dick"

    seriously. why would you want to punish your kid like that?

     

     

    I knew a Dick White, who was actually white. He served in the military and during roll calls, everyone couldn't help but burst laughing everytime his name was called, "White, Dick!"

  3. Precisely! The problem does not lie on somebody courting your GF. The problem would be if your GF entertains, or worse, encourages it. In case of the latter, then you should confront your GF. I think it's a very immature reaction to confront the other guy. The problem is strictly between you and your GF. As the parties involved, you should resolve it between the two of you. An attractive woman, even those who are already married and with children, will always attract suitors. It's really up to the girl where the courtship will loead to.

     

    As they say, if you don't want or can't handle this sort of problem, then, humanap ka na lang ng pangit!

  4. Ah so, bale ur main beef with our present laws on the dissolution of marriages is the time frame. Ur right, it takes a very long time to go though the entire process, ang mahal pa.

     

    What u want is an Express Counter where u can expedite the whole process and get a new lease on committing the same mistake again.

     

    Well and good. I see ur point and I expect u see mine, too.

     

    Just for the sake of discussion: could u draft ur idea of a divorce bill? What will be its provisions? How will it be different from our subsisting laws that address the same issues?

     

    Should be interesting reading.

     

    I am not a lawyer so I can't claim to know more than you do. But as a layman (figuratively and otherwise), my understanding is that the difference goes beyond timing and expeditiousness (is there such a word?) Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think our present laws provide for annulment or separation of properties only.

     

    My own beef is with regard to annulment. Why pretend that something wasn't valid from the onset when it was? Why not call a spade a spade, and say that people make mistakes and can therefore undo their mistakes legally and responsibly, paying for the price.

     

    As far as separation of properties are concerned, isn't it that the separated couples couldn't remarry after?

×
×
  • Create New...