Jump to content

skycentral68

[04] MEMBER II
  • Posts

    173
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by skycentral68

  1. nakakapagtaka rin kasi kundi ako nagkakamali e pinuri pa ni pres duterte ang pcso.

    nung napalitan ang hepe ng pcso dahil me allegations ng corruption e ndi pa rin nawala totally.

    tingin ko naniniwala ako dun sa sinasabing ang mga nakikinabang lalu na sa pagkuha ng franchise e mostly yung mga retired pnp and miltary.

     

    me actual experience kasi ako dyan kaya nadiscourage ako nung ang aaply ako for a franchise. lahat mg location ko ndi valid. later to learn na kapag wala ka kapit sa loob mahirap ka makakuha unless yung location mo is nasa province and totally walang lotohan within the next 5km. then i just realized na yung dati ko tao nagtataka ako panu nakakuha ng franchise within an area na dikit dikit na ang lotohan e ang nag represent sa kanya ang tatay nya na retired pnp tsk tsk..

     

    nakakalungkot kasi mananaya rin ako ng lotto at isa aa umaasa ng swerte pero natutuwa rin kasi nasilip na kabuktutan ng mga nasa loob. malas nga lang nung mga me lotohan na umuupa ng pwesto pero sana mabuwag na kalokohan dyan kasi ang laking pera ang pinaghahatian ng kita bago pa mapunta sa gobyerno at maitulong sa nangangailangan.

  2. He appraised many of the govt agencies for their achievements and mentioned corrections to corrupt agencies but never mentioned how lousy and non-proactive LTFRB is! It has been time and again issues comes out of this agency and yet the board may have done something but already after the fact na. Time is gold and life of the people! They should stop wasting precious time of the Dilipinos with your idiocracy. It is high time to replace the members of this board!

  3. In Singapore the government party (People's Action Party) evaluates the integrity of their own candidates, but the opposition parties are not mandated to do the same (though they may follow similar selection process). The Singaporeans have a choice to trust PAP's chosen candidates or vote for the opposition. That's the huge difference between Singapore and China. China has one single party -- no alternative choice.

     

    It is not a democracy if the candidates are vetted by anybody other than the voters who can choose freely.

     

    An "independent body" can never be trusted to be independent.

    yes i know what sgp and china has. if an independent can never be trusted to be independent, then how? who can the people trust? point of this discussion is kung me pag asa pa ba. my opinion is wala na, unless, there will be an electoral reform. that’s my opinion.

  4. What you wish for will never happen, unless you want an authoritarian government like in mainland China. In their system, the "candidates" are vetted by the Communist Party before they can "run" for public office. Now they have a system as corrupt as the Imperial monarchy and the Nationalist government that they replaced.

     

    Our current democratic system is good enough if we just give it a chance. Educating the voters on how to choose the right candidate is one way to improve the system. This forum is part of that education process.

     

    i guess you’re right. but then there must be something good and better done in China right now and they are following communism. Singapore has that evaluation system and they are democratic not communist and yet they’re better than us. since my childhood in the ‘60s, my elderlies have been bickering about politics and how it should have been. its 2019 now and all my elderlies are have departed and still the voting public doesnt know how to select the proper person to be in that position. this is the reason why the need for an electoral reform that is merited over the amendment of the constitution but not change in constitution. yes education is good but what is the correct way of educating our voting public? what i intend to say is that the independent body will pre-qualify or filter the candidates to just a few and getting rid of all those corruption-contaminated and traditional politicians. so from the few pre-qualified candidates, whoever is chosen by the voting public, at least we can sleep better at walang tulak kabigin maski sinu man sa kanila mapili.

  5. wala na pagbabago yan unless magkaron ng electoral reform. sana meron independent body that will make an honest to goodness evaluation of a candidate before the prospective candidate will file for a govt position. once qualified then the independent body will circulate the qualifications, achievements, and platform of the candidate. this way, malalaman ng voting public kung na yung candidate e ndi involved or implicated in a corruption issue in the past, ndi member ng isa or numerous political family, has a sound and feasible platform of what he or she can do in the govt position for the interest of many, etc. at present, i would say na mas intelligent na ang voting public pero marami pa rin na ndi totally knowledgeable about sa candidate kaya na nagre rely na lang kung sinu ang pinaka maingay or me monetary favors just to exercise this right to suffrage.

×
×
  • Create New...