moed

Well, in that case, to "force" her to pay legally, you need a court order which requires court action. Now, you can complain with the barangay but lupon proceedings requires her to agree to any payment. If she refuses to pay, you still will have to go to court. Have a lawyer send her a demand letter and see how it goes.

 

Considering that your goal is recovery of the Php 21,000.00, it's best to determine if she has any assets which you can get. Kung meron, you might consider filing a small claim case rather than a criminal case. Mas mabilis and you don't have to worry bout atty. fees. You can still opt to file a criminal case, however, usually maaaaataaaaagaaaal talaga yung kaso unless maswerte ka at mapunta yung kaso sa judge na masipag.

Ganon din sa criminal case, sa prosecutor pa lang gusto din areglo, maski nakasuhan, sa korte naman mediation din. Sayang pa oras pabalikbalik sa munisipyo sa halaga na yan.

Up ko lang po sana ulit un tanong ko na ito, thanks!

 

Anung grounds of argument ba ang puede kong gamitin regarding conjugal properties just in case, if ever kaya ko nang magfile ng annulment primary ang reason ko is to secure exclusive property ng bahay ko. Actually eversince naman na I purchased the house wala naman nanggaling sa kanya, maliban sa renovation expenses which is one time lang. the house is mortgaged and she never contributed to pay the monthly amortization. Kami ng mother ko ang nagfifinance sa bahay. I read from the articles that I can file an exclusive ownership, and balak koi reimburse sa kanya un binigay nyang pinangrenovate ng bahay nuon. Before nun nagpapadala sya napupunta lang naman sa panggastos sa anak namin. She is the one who went away literally nagabroad sya, and ngaun if ever magbabakasyon sya I doubt if she wishes to stay in our house. Isa pa I have a gf already for 2 yrs now. In the future I want to build a family again also na maititira ko sa bahay ko, hindi un maglilive in kami sa kung saan saan.

 

Lumalabas kasi na co borrower cya nun house ko, its just frustrating for me na hiniwalayan na nga ako tapos sarili kong bahay hindi ko mapatirhan in the future kung gusto ko uli magkapamilya, avoiding the scandal which may erupt dahil kasal nga ako.

Depende kung may ante-nuptial agreement kayo. Sinasabi mo conjugal property yan, pero may legal meaning ang conjugal property under the Family Code. Yan ang under sa Regime of Conjugal Partnership of Gains. Pag wala kayong ante-nuptial agreement, System of Absolute Community of Property ang mag govern sa property relations ninyo.

Section 2. What Constitutes Community Property

Art. 91. Unless otherwise provided in this Chapter or in the marriage settlements, the community property shall consist of all the property owned by the spouses at the time of the celebration of the marriage or acquired thereafter. (197a)

Art. 92. The following shall be excluded from the community property:

(1) Property acquired during the marriage by gratuitous title by either spouse, and the fruits as well as the income thereof, if any, unless it is expressly provided by the donor, testator or grantor that they shall form part of the community property;

(2) Property for personal and exclusive use of either spouse. However, jewelry shall form part of the community property;

(3) Property acquired before the marriage by either spouse who has legitimate descendants by a former marriage, and the fruits as well as the income, if any, of such property. (201a)

Art. 93. Property acquired during the marriage is presumed to belong to the community, unless it is proved that it is one of those excluded therefrom. (160) chan robles virtual law library

Yung puede mong ground gamitin ay ang Art. 92 (1). Puede mong palabasin binigay ng nanay mo sa iyo during the existence of the marriage, not before. Kung di kaya palabasin ito, iprove na part ng house belongs to your mother, para yung part na yon ay hinde kasama sa absolute community of property ninyong magasawa. Mahirap lang kasi nga dahil pagnakapangalan sa yo yang bahay, presumption nyan absolute community dahil what was owned by you at the time of the celebration of the marriage or acquired after the marriage is absolute community of property.

If one of the spouses get married in the Philippines and the other spouse has an issue with the divorce, the latter might show that they got married in Canada which marriage would be recognized by the Philippines and the former spouse will be liable for bigamy. Better to get married outside the Philippines so Philippine courts wouldn't have jurisdiction over the second marriage.

If the spouse gets married in the Philippines and the spouse he or she divorced has an issue with the divorce, the latter could show proof that they got married in Canada, which Philippine laws would recognize, and the former could be charged with bigamy. If the former really wants to marry again, it would be safer to do so in another country so that the Philippines wouldn't have jurisdiction over the second marriage even if bigamous under our law.

Master's

 

Meron po ba kayong books or websites na matututunan ko ang real estate dito sa pilipinas, kasi as in wala akong alam kung papano bumili ng property baka kasi maloko ako pag meron akong mapaginteresan na property.

 

Thanks in Advance.

Real Estate in the Philippines by Edward L. Tan, P350 dati sa National Bookstore. Medyo comprehensive lang nga ito pati development ng subdivision.

MASTERS,

 

SOMEONE IS OFFERING ME A "SANLA-TIRA" FOR HER HOUSE AND LOT. ANG SISTE, YUNG TITLE NG NASABING HOUSE & LOT AY NAKA-MORTGAGED PA SA BANGKO. WHAT'S THE BEST WAY TO HANDLE THIS.

 

1. DAPAT BANG BAYARAN NYA MUNA YUNG OUTSTANDING DUE NIYA FROM THE BANK THEN PA-TRANSFER KO YUNG ANNOTATION OF MORTGAGE FROM THE BANK TO ME...PARA MAY PANGHAHAWAKAN AKO IF IN CASE MAGDEFAULT SIYA NG PAYMENT SA BANK.

 

2. ANO YUNG KASUNDUAN OR CONTRACT SA GANITONG TRANSACTION.

 

PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME ON THESE. THANKS.

Clarify natin itong issues na ito. Provisions ng Civil Code na relevant:

Art. 2130- A stipulation forbidding the owner from alienating the immovable mortgaged shall be void.

Art. 2129- A creditor may claim from a third person in possession of the mortgaged property, the payment of the part of the credit secured by the property which said third person possesses, in the terms and with the formalities which the law establishes.

Ibig sabihin ang malaking factor dito ay kung magano ang utang at kung magano ang value ng property. Kung ang utang ay mababa kumpara sa value ng property, walang problema at puede mo bayaran ang utang at lamang ka pa. Malamang hinde nya mabayaran ang utang nya sa banko kaya sinasanla sa yo ang bahay. Ibig sabihin nito, second mortgagor ka, kaya kailangan ang equity nya sa bahay ay masmalaki kaysa sa ipapautang mo sa kanya. Ibig sabihin ng equity nya sa bahay ay ang value ng bahay minus ang utang nya sa bangko. Kung P 1M ang bahay at ang utang nya sa bangko ay P 500 thou, ang equity nya sa bahay ay P 500 thou. Kung papautangin mo sya nang P 200 thou tapos singilin ka ng banko ng P 500 thou dahil hinde nya mabayaran, di nakabili ka ng P 1M na bahay for P 700 thousand. Problema lang nga ay kung may cash in hand ka o liquid ka pagsingil ng banko.

ako na rin yata sasagot nagreseach ako

 

Sec. 2. 1 All deposits of whatever nature with banks or banking institutions in the Philippines including investments in bonds issued by the Government of the Philippines, its political subdivisions and its instrumentalities, are hereby considered as of an absolutely confidential nature and may not be examined, inquired or looked into by any person, government official, bureau or office, except upon written permission of the depositor, or in cases of impeachment, or upon order of a competent court in cases of bribery or dereliction of duty of public officials, or in cases where the money deposited or invested is the subject matter of the litigation.

 

so hindi na mahahabol yung 3k na naiscam am I correct?

Kung kakasohan mo talaga yan, mapasibil man o criminal, hinde mo naman kailangan yung bank account info from bank dahil may deposit slip ka na sana hinde mo tinapon. Pakita mo advertisement o offer to sell at kung may iba pa kayong communication na nagagree kayo na bibilhin mo sa kanya yung item sa halaga na napagkasundoan at nagawa mo na yong pinagusapan na ideposito halaga sa pinagkasundoan account. Problema maski sa small claims court e ang liit ng halaga hinde sapat sa pagdadaanan mo para magsampa kaso.

good day sir rocco69, i have some questions. let's say a girl is married at nalaman ng husband niya na may BF siya. 1) ano pwedeng gawin ng husband sa girl legally? 2) can the hubby just take their children away without any due process? 3) can the husband stop sending money from abroad even without due process? 5) what can the girl do?

 

thanks.

Malamang dahil asawa mo ang babae at ngayon sya may bf, puede siguro ipresume na nagsesex sila. Kunan mo ng proeba na nagsesex sila, pareha ng picture na pumupunta sa motel o nagoovernight sa bahay ng bf o kung saan man at takotin mo idemanda ng adultery. Malamang makukuha mo kung ano gusto mo sa kanya pati sa bf dahil pati bf dali sa adultery.

Hi, I would like to ask for some inputs.

My cousin purchase a House and Lot thru PAGIBIG, but went abroad while still paying the equity.

He continue it thru PAGIBIG POP and leave me an SPA and I was the one who issue the checks for PAGIBIG.

 

Now, he is already paying it monthly amortization for 4 years and no one using the house.

There is an interested buyer to purchase it in cash. But the buyer want to make sure that it will be transfer to him.

 

We made an arrangement to pay first partial amount that will be paid to PAGIBIG the full loan balance and the remaining balance will be paid once the title is released by PAGIBIG and that is the only we will execute the deed of sale. The buyer want to have a contract to sell, stating the terms of payment and when will be deed of sale be executed.

 

Since the owner is still abroad, and I am the atty in-fact before, can I issue and sign a Contract to Sell and Deed of Sale to the Buyer ? I lost my copy of SPA, we get a copy of title from the developer and it has an inscription in the title stating that the owner assign me as atty in-fact and the date SPA was executed.

The more important issue you have to take up is what type of transaction you should enter into. In this case, it might be better for you to enter into a Deed of Assignment with your buyer with the consent of PAGIBIG. You would need personal legal advice on this matter as there are necessary documents to be drafted anyway.

Thanks Sir moed for your comments. Some questions: is a Memorandum of Understanding legally binding as a Contract to Sell? Is it (MOU) notorized?

Yes it is notarized. This is what we do with our land sales where the purchase price is really high and the property is an ordinary asset. We form a new corp to transfer the lot to and execute deed of assignments for the shares of stock of the new corp. This is a more technical procedure though as you would have to get a ruling from the BIR, then have to apply for increase in authorized capital. There will be no problem transfering the title to the buyer as long as all the parties are serious with the transaction and are all reliable.

Would appreciate your advice on this - a company is interested in acquiring our property in Gen Santos and has proposed to pay P500K cash and the balance covered by a bank guarantee on the balance when we present (to the bank) the title of the property already transferred to the name of the buyer (the bank's client). How can I protect our interests in this transaction, considering I have to execute an absolute deed of sale to transfer the title to the buyers name but have received only P500K in cash? The bank guarantee proforma is letter of assurance of payment of the balance only upon transfer of title to the buyer (the bank's client).

There should be no problem here specially if the bank is a reputable bank. Just make sure you make the bank a party to the transaction through a Memorandum of Understanding and add the cost of transferring the property to the buyer's name in the price of the sale. If you don't want to do the procedure yourself get an agent as you will be adding the cost of transfer to the sale price anyway. For me, this would be a better sale than a sale through installments which is usually the case with Contracts to Sell as this would be closer to a sale in cash, as long as the bank is a reputable bank.

Answered already.

Thanks sir moed for the quick reply.

 

Basically, my understanding is that the tax declaration must be changed to reflect the reconstituted TCT. once the new tax declaration comes out. that is the time that my friend can proceed with purchase and the transfer. Am i correct? thanks

Might as well let the vendor work on the update of the tax declaration. Tell your friend to get the copy of the updated tax dec and also have the vendor get a copy of a certified true copy as well for submission to register of deeds upon transfer of the title to your friends name, if he does purchase the property. Come to think of it, if he could, might as well let the vendor submit the real property tax clearance to him as well, to make sure the real property tax payments are current and lessen the acquisition of documents necessary for the transfer of the TCT to his name.

Good am mga experts,

 

I have a question: My friend is going to buy a property in QC. The original TCT was shown and upon verification with the LRA, The original was lost in the fire in QC hall in the 80s. The seller was able to have the TCT reconstituted(via judicial process).The old TCT was surrendered & a new TCT bearing the number 004-RT2011xxxxxx(yyyyyy) (where yyyyyyy is the original TCT number) was issued & was verified at the LRA. But the tax declaration is still the old one (bearing the old details).

 

My question is: Is there a need to change the tax declaration also after the reconstitution? if my friend bought the property without getting the new (updated) tax declaration, can he have the property registered in his name?

 

Thanks in advance!

The tax declaration follows the TCT. Before you can have the TCT transferred to another persons name, the Register of Deeds requires a certified true copy of the tax declaration. Necessarily, the tax declaration has to be consistent with the TCT. In this case, if your friend buys the property and he wants the TCT transferred to his name, he will have to update the tax declaration of the property to reflect the circumstances of the new TCT. It will not be difficult to update the tax declaration, though, as the current TCT itself will specify the circumstances of the reconstitution and as you yourself said, the current TCT even bears the previous TCT number. This will be a simple matter for the Assessors Office (department in charge of Tax Decs) to take notice of.

Thanks sir Moed,

 

May gusto lang ako iclarify. Salamat po ulit.

Pag naapprove ang H1B mo at lumipat ka sa Company B, 3 year duration ang H1B, ang L1 mo ay mawawalan na ng bisa dahil hinde ka na nga nagtatrabaho sa Company A. Dahil empleyado ka pa ng Company A, valid pa stay mo sa L1, pero paginimbistigahan ka ng ICE, baka sabihin na in controvention of the L1 ang ginagawa. Pero kung makalusot di magpachange to H1B ka na nga habang legally staying in the US.

Pag nasa US ka na at matagal tagal na jan, hanap ka na ng abogado na makahanap ng paraan para maka immigrant visa ka. Siguro during the 3 year effectivity of your H1B, kaya na nila yan. Worse case scenario, gandahan mo trabaho sa Company B para i reapply H1B mo after 3 years. Suerte mo nga mahina na pila sa H1B ngayon, dati nong boom ang US, unang arraw ng application nyan ubos quota, pinagraraffle yan.

Good pm po.

 

Tanong ko sana sa mga mababait na immigration lawyer sa forum na ito. Currently meron akong L1 visa issued by Company A. Ini apply ko sya noong June, 2006 at nag renew ako noong Dec, 2009. Ang duration na binigay para sa dalawang visa(original at renewal) ay tig 3 years. Sa visa ko na ito, nagamit ko sila lang ng isang(1) taon at apat(4) na buwan. Ngayon, nag offer si Company B ng sponsorship para sa H1B sa akin, pero habang pinaprocess ang petition ko, gagamitin ko muna ang L1B ko with Company A's permission under consultancy basis for four(4) months.

 

Ang tanong po :

1. Tama ba na ang pagkaintindi ko, ang magiging valid stay ko na lang sa US pagkatapos maapprove ang H1B ko ay 3 years and 4 months na lang? Kasi kung isu suma total, ang magiging L1 usage ko ay 1 year and 8 months; 1 year 4 months + 4 months = 1 year 8 months. Kung i babawas ito sa 5 years na allowed stay under a temporary working visa ay 3 years and 4 months na lang.

2. Pwede ko ba isabay ang application ng H1B at residency(eto ba ang green card?) or meron pa dapat required month of stay sa US bago makapag apply

3. Makapag tatrabaho ba ang H1B dependent kapag nasa US na? Tulad din ba ito ng L1 na magrerequest din ng approval from labor?

4. Kapag na approve na ang H1B ko, kelangan ko pa ba umuwi sa Pilipinas at pumunta sa US Embassy?

5. Kung sakali pa din na maapprove ang H1B petition at nag apply ako ng residency at natanggap ko na ang confirmation ng US immigration na natanggap na nila ang application ko, pede pa din ba ako mag stay sa US habang expired na ang H1B visa ko?

 

Pasensya na po sa madaming tanong pero sana may magtyaga na sumagot.

 

Salamat ng madami.

1. Hinde tama yang computation mo. Hinde puede iadd yang L1 mo at H1B. Yang L-1 mo ay intracompany transferee visa. Ang requirement jan ay you must have been employed abroad as an executive, as a manager, or in a position requiring specialized knowledge. You must have been employed in that capacity for one continuous year out of the three years prior to your being transferred to the US. The work you will do in the US must be for the same company or an affiliate or a subsidiary of that company. Dahil may requirements yan, maski may approval ng Company A, hinde mo magamit yang L1 mo for Company B kung di ito affiliate or subsidiary of Company A. Ang L1 visa ay company specific.

2. Kung may paraan ka na magstay legally in the US during pendency of your application for H1-B, hinde mo kailangan lumabas, magpachange to H1B ka lang. Problema mo nga, kung ang pag gamit mo ng L1 mo jan ay hinde legal, as in ang companya na pinagtratrabahohan mo ay hinde ang nagpetition sa yo o subsidiary o affiliate, hinde valid ang L1 na para sa yo, maski may approval ng Company A. May third party sa usapan na ito which is the USA. Hinde ka rin makapagapply ng residency at ang L1 at H1B ay mga non-immigrant visas.

3. Ang dependents at spouse ay magiging H4 visa holders na hinde makatrabaho sa US legally.

4. Hinde kailangan kung makakastay in the US legally, mag pa change to H1B lang. Kung hinde makastay sa US legally, dapat ay umuwi ka at masmadali ang approval ng H1B kaysa ibang nonimmigrant visa kung maayos ang petition ng employer at hinde kailangan iprove na he or she intends to return home after stay in the US. Warning lang, kung na out-of-status ka sa US, baka may bar from returning ka ng 3 hangang 10 years, depende sa violation.

5. Hinde makaapply ng green card from a nonimmigrant visa, pero puede naman magfile ng bagong H1B petition ang employer mo pag magexpire na H1B visa.

Matagaltagal at mahirap din pala ang processo sa H1B. Kung talagan may magpepetition sa yo ng H1B, at hinde subsidiary o affiliate ng Company A ang Company B, mabuti pa na umuwi ka muna at pag may violation ka ng stay mo sa US may mga penalties ito tulad ng 3-10 year bar.

Thanks Man.

 

What if, I just run way. anyway wala naman silang mahihita sa akin. wala naman akong properties o kung ano man.

 

Any good point?

Sorry, last sentence of my post should have been creditor instead of debtor. Creditor would be willing to accept lower amount instead of going through hassle of litigation.

Under Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Cases, failure of defendant to respond authorizes the court to render judgment as warranted by facts alleged by plaintiff. Meaning he would be able to get judgment and plaintiff may ask the officer enforcing judgment to garnish your income from your employer.

Sir, actually am the defendant. i do paying them by salary deduction and then eventually i stopped when i resigned from work. I guess my balance was 4k plus. i thought it was fine because i have pending salary to compensate the balance. "company to bank agreement" i do have also co-maker to pay the obligation if ever i fail to pay them.

 

It summed up to 11k including arrears and attorneys 10% fees. anyway, am willing to pay the said amount to settle the issue.

 

If ever, i shall compromise to pay off court would it possible to arrange also the payment filed by plaintiff called "case filing fee" na bayaran ko rin? tama po ba?

 

May hearing date na po kasi ako.

 

Salamas

You can offer to amicably settle the case at the hearing. As is usual in cases like this, when the loan you obtained is covered by a contract stipulating interests, penalties and expenses to be incurred for litigation is borne by the debtor, it's better to pay off the loan as agreed upon. In this case, it seems like the creditor is in this business so he will probably also be able to get the officer enforcing the judgment of the court to garnish your future wages. Hopefully you have a friend who's a lawyer to help you out, but not appear at the hearing of course, but if not, obtaining the services of a lawyer would just add to your expenses. It would be better to pay what the plaintiff is asking for instead. Try to negotiate to lower the amount you have to pay at the hearing. Usually, a debtor would agree to get a lower amount, specially if it will be paid in full in one payment, than go through the hassle of litigation. Good luck.

mga sir, can you check out this video i watched sa kabilang thread:

http://www.remate.ph/rematevideo/?p=55

 

hindi ba pwede kasuhan yung pulis na nagpakasasa muna bago hinuli yung psp? suppose to be 'pag binayaran na and nakahubad na, dun na pwedeng hulihin like what's happening sa xxx, imbestigador, etc.

Kung pakingan mo yong narration, ang sabi ay asset yung ginamit na ientrap yung prosti, malamang hinde ito pulis at civilian na ginagamit ng pulis sa mga operation nila.

That gap in residence history means that what you submitted has a more than 6 month period which is unaccounted for. For example, maybe you put May, 1980 to May, 1986, Manila; Dec, 1986 to the present, Cebu City. They want a complete list of your places of residences and each period you were a resident of said district must be covered by a police certification clearing you of any offense that would be a ground of inadmisssibility/exclusion like being a drug abuser or drug addict, conviction/admission of a crime involving moral turpitude that is not a purely political offense and other grounds. Technically speaking, the consular office is the one in charge of visitor and immigration applications even though the place where non-Americans apply for visas is more often referred to as the US embassy. Or maybe it's your police clearances which has a gap, for example, maybe there is a certain period of your previous places of residence which is not covered by the police clearances you submitted.

Thanks sir Moed.

 

Follow up question lang. Nakita ko na yung CTC. Nakapangalan sya sa seller. Pero expired na ang franchise. May application for renewal. Nagdaan na sa first hearing at na-dismiss kasi wala yung document na vineverify yung previous owners. Kasi daw dumating yung araw ng hearing eh yung return to sender from post office hindi pa nadating. Pero nagfile na sya ng motion for reconsideration. Pano ko malalaman kung pwede pa marenew? gusto kasi nung seller ako na magtuloy ng process. May nirefer sya sa akin na naglalakad sa LTFRB. ang sabi nun naglalakad, kayang kaya nya raw yun. Please advise. Thanks

Mahirap na yan dahil nadismiss na nga sa first hearing ang application for extension. Usually nag aapply renewal bago mag expire CPC. Yang guarantee sa yo ng maglalakad wala kang makuha jan pag hinde naextend. Ikaw lahat gamble jan pag hinde naextend at yang taxi na bilhin mo magiging private car na maraming kilometro na nabiyahe. Tagilid ka sa usapan na yan. Saka malabo yang sinasabi na nadismiss dahil kulang sa document na nagveverify previous owners, ibig sabihin yan, hinde pa naapprove yung sale and transfer ng CPC sa seller dahil vineverify pa ang previous owners.

Salamat po ng marami. By the way how about po yung tungkol sa SPA ng ate nila? Lola ko lang may pirma at yung mga witness niya is mga office mates/friends nya since patago ng pinagawa nya yun. pano po ba aalisin yun. At ano po mga legal steps para makuha na nila mga shares nila?

Ang ownership ng lote ay matatransfer from owner to heirs by operation of law, meaning after mamatay, malilipat ownership sa heirs. Pero para mapalitan tct nyan para mareflect ang ownership sa lote,kailangan ng Extrajudicial Settlement at kailangan muna bayaran ang estate tax ng namatay. Sa pag file ng estate tax na yan, nakalagay lahat ng ariarian ng namatay, real at personal, pati bank accounts para macompute and estate tax at ang estate tax na binabayaran ay depende sa value na iniwan ng namatay. Pag nabayaran estate tax, iisue ang BIR ng Certificate Authorizing Registration, na requirement sa pagpapalit ng TCT sa pangalan ng heirs. Tapos sa municipyo naman kailangan ng tax clearance sa Real Estate Division, Transfer Tax sa City Treasurer's Office at ng TCT. Mahirap mag extrajudicial settlement pag hinde magagree heirs sa kung ano dapat mapunta sa kanila.

Yang SPA na inexecute ng lola mo sa kapatid ng nanay mo, effective lang yan sa share ng lola mo sa lote nya. Hinde yan effective as sa ibang mayari na hinde siya ginawang attorney in fact.

Sorry sa double post. Di alam pano nangyari.

Good day sa mga abogado ng MTC

 

May tanong lang ako. Balak ko sanang magnegosyo ng taxi. May nga nakausap na ako ng nagbebenta ng taxi. Yung iba with franchise, at yung iba naman for renewal ang franchise. Paano ko maveverify kung walang problema sa ownership ang sasakyan lalo na kung hindi first owner ang seller at paano ko maveverify kung marerenew pa ang franchise nito at kung walang problema sa mga papeles?

 

ANy advice kung anu-ano ang mga steps na kailangan kong i-undertake sa pagbili ng franchise at taxi?

ero

Iba pa ba ang franchise sa linya?

 

Salamat ng marami

Tingnan mo yung Certificate of Public Convenience (CPC) ng taxi na bibilhin mo at doon nakalagay ang period na puede ioperate ang taxi na may CPC. Tingnan mo rin kung ang nagbebenta sa iyo ang mayari ng CPC. Kung siya ang mayari, kung gusto mo legal ang sale and transfer ng CPC, kailangan mag apply for approval of sale sa LTFRB. Kung mageexpire na CPC, alamin kung puede pa iextend. Meron naman bumibili ng taxi at hinde pinapaaprove ang transfer pero siempre delikado rin dahil bawal ito under the law and dahil nakapangalan pa ang unit sa seller, baka maloko ka. Pagnagpaapprove ng sale and transfer of CPC sa LTFRB, kailangan abogado at may mga hearing to sa Board ng LTFRB.

Good day sa mga abogado ng MTC

 

May tanong lang ako. Balak ko sanang magnegosyo ng taxi. May nga nakausap na ako ng nagbebenta ng taxi. Yung iba with franchise, at yung iba naman for renewal ang franchise. Paano ko maveverify kung walang problema sa ownership ang sasakyan lalo na kung hindi first owner ang seller at paano ko maveverify kung marerenew pa ang franchise nito at kung walang problema sa mga papeles?

 

ANy advice kung anu-ano ang mga steps na kailangan kong i-undertake sa pagbili ng franchise at taxi?

ero

Iba pa ba ang franchise sa linya?

 

Salamat ng marami

Tingnan mo yung Certificate of Public Convenience (CPC) ng taxi na bibilhin mo at doon nakalagay ang period na puede ioperate ang taxi na may CPC. Tingnan mo rin kung ang nagbebenta sa iyo ang mayari ng CPC. Kung siya ang mayari, kung gusto mo legal ang sale and transfer ng CPC, kailangan mag apply for approval of sale sa LTFRB. Kung mageexpire na CPC, alamin kung puede pa iextend. Meron naman bumibili ng taxi at hinde pinapaaprove ang transfer pero siempre delikado rin dahil bawal ito under the law and dahil nakapangalan pa ang unit sa seller, baka maloko ka. Pagnagpaapprove ng sale and transfer of CPC sa LTFRB, kailangan abogado at may mga hearing to sa Board ng LTFRB.