Jump to content

cato_valdemor

[03] MEMBER
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cato_valdemor

  1. good day!

     

    Ask ko lng. ANo po ba yung concept of TRUST na nakalagay sa civil code? naguguluhn ako dun. What's TRUST all about??

    and tanong ko na rin yung concept ng ESTOPPEL and kung saan magagamit yun. much better kung may example para makuha agad. lapit na exam eh. hehe.. alam ko di legal advice to pero wla na ako resources eh. sarado na library ngaun, thank you so much sa mga mkakatulong..,

     

    Thanks!!!

     

    tama yung sinabi ni dr. pepper

     

    additional lang.

     

    there are two kinds of trust: express trust at implied trust

     

    there are two types of implied trust: resulting trust and constructive trust

     

    In express trust, it can be created by agreement between the parties, either in writing or verbally.

     

    In implied trust, there are no agreements, the law considers them as trust relationship (by operation of law)

     

    Implied resulting trust: there is an intention to create a trust relationship but short of putting the same into an express agreement of trust relationship.

     

    example:

     

    A bought a real estate property but have the same registered in the name of B, a friend. They failed to agree that the property will be under an express trust relationship. the money used to buy the aforesaid real property came solely from A, but was registered in the name of B. Here, the trustor is B and the trustee is A. B is the legal owner; A is the beneficial owner.

     

    Implied constructive trust: there is no intention to create a trust relationship but the law equitably considers the situation as one implied constructive trust.

     

    Article 1456 of the civil code is the best example of implied constructive trust.

  2. kinakasuhan ako nang nakasuntukan ko na kapitbahay dahil sa parking,,mminura ko daw sya eh,,ganito kasi yun,ung bahay nya eh nasa may kanto tapat ng kalye ung kalye ng subdivision ay pinaparadahan ng lahat ng may sasakyan,,kiniclaim nila na sila daw ang may karapatan na pumarada dun dahil kanila daw un,,nilagyan ka nila ng metal post na nakabolt sa kalsada,,eh minsan umalis,kasi linggo,usually,nagtatagal sila bago bumalik,,eh madumi ung car,inisip ko linisin,,kaso malyo at di abot ung hose ko,,so inilipat ko,,eh dumating bigla,,binusinahan ako,,di minadali ko na na paglilinis,,binababa ako sabi sa akin,,"alisin mo sasakyan mo,paparada ako,"eh may sabon pa windshield ko,,sabi ko'sandali lang banlawan ko",,ang sabi sa akin,hindi alisin mo na paparada ako",, bakit daw dun ako nghuhugas sa parking area nya,,sabi ko di lang abot ung hose ko.."wala akong pakialam kung di abot,,alisin sasakyan mo mo"tapos tinanong ako na ano daw ba gusto kong mangyari..hindi na ako kumibo nun,,binanlawan ko na lang ung ssasakyan,,ang ginawa ba naman,pinuntahan ung mother ko,at sinabihan na paalisin dawako,,66 year old ung mother ko,,dinadamay nya,,pumunta mothe ko,,sabi sa akin lumipat na nga lang daw ako,,sabi ko sa mother ko sandali lang,,humungi ng pasencya ung mother ko sa kanila,,naawa naman ako,dahil bakit kami hihingi ng pasensya,di nman kanila ung kalye,kahit ba dun sila pumaparada before pa,,di ko naman inaagaw ung kanila daw parking,,dun s apoint na un,,nagalit ako,sabi ko sa mother ko,dahil kami naman ng mothr ko nag uusap,,wag kayo humingi ng pasensya sa "putang inang yan" ..yan ang kwento,,my karugtong pa,pero ung slander case dyan nila binabase advice namanpo,need ko talaga

     

     

    slander ba kinaso sayo? anung klaseng slander? slander by deed ba or slander per se? kung slander on the basis na nagmura ka lang, eto ang aking piece of legal opinion. Unang una, me kaso na naifile ayon sa kwento mo. Di mo lang nasabi kung anung stage na, either nasa preliminary investigation stage or nasa court na. either case, ang pagmumura o pagsasabi ng "p#tang %na" ay hindi libelous. sabi ng ating korte suprema, ang pagmumura ay isa lamang "mere expression of disgust" at hindi absolutong "libelous". pangalawa, sa mga kasong ganyan, kelangan ng element ng "malice", ngunit sa kwento mo ala akong nakitang malice as an element of slander (libel). nga lang, it is a metter of defense on your part na lang, kung nasa preliminary investigation, ipakita mo ito sa iyong counter affidavit. kung nasa court na, intayin mo na lang ang turn mo to present your evidence para marinig ang side ng story mo, but of course, your defense counsel should cross examine the complainant on his side of story, to test its veracity.

  3. i need your expert advice here....

    here's d story

    nabangga kc ako s q.c. s intersection ngyari. may kasama ako at that time kya sya ung tinignan ko muna. ung driver ng nakabangga s akin akala ko tatawag ng taxi... kya lng d n bumalik. iniwan nya ung kotse s daan. then a few minutes may dumating n 2ng mama, then un may ari ng kotse kc s kanya nakarehistro ung sasakyan.

     

    in other words ung driver ng sasakyan at that time ay hindi may ari ng kotse.

     

    so ngpunta ako presinto para bgay statement..d nxt day tawag ako s may ari ng kotse ng nkabangga s akin. parang walang 2long n ibibigay. i tried to convince n off the court settlement n lng para d n magastos, eh sbi nya i-file ko n lng. mayabang kausap ung may ari... tsk tsk

     

    ang sbi nya gumagastos daw sya s pag manhunt ng ngdrive ng kotse nya... pwede b yun ipahihiram mo ang kotse mo s d mo kilala...

     

    anyways dadalhin ko p lng ung job description ng kotse ko s presinto... am i taking the process 2 long... tinatry ko n mas mabilis mgkaroon ng aksyon kc gusto ko n ipagawa ang kotse ko...

     

    sino b ang dapat managot? wat is d best thing that i must do? pls help.... thanks

     

     

     

    You have a clear case in your favor based on your facts, both criminally and civilly....however, if your prime objective is to get your car repaired (bago ba?), why not exhust first the remedy of insurance. doe your car have insurance? check also if the car that collided with yours has also an insurance, particularly THRID PARTY PROPERTY DAMAGE COVERAGE. If you have your comprehensive insurance, go to your insurance company and use your "own damage coverage". If the colliding car has a third party property damage, talked to the owner thereof, and have it settled thourgh insurance scheme. In that way, you wcan obviate the possiblity of going to court, if your objective only is to get your car repared. if you want to file just the same a case in court, you can likewise do so, civilly or criminally as what has been stated in the previous opinion.

×
×
  • Create New...