Jump to content


Photo

MTC Legal Thread

legal advice

  • Please log in to reply
12364 replies to this topic

#12281 kulkawal

kulkawal

    Experienced

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts

Posted 06 July 2019 - 07:48 AM

Sales person po ako sa isang company. Naterminate po ako last april. Last June nakatanggap po ako ng demand letter galing sa company. Sinisingil nila saken yung mga short payments ng customers ko.

Ang tanong ko po, pwede po b nila ako kasuhan dahil sa short payments ng customers? Nireview ko yung employment contract ko at wala nman nakalagay na may liability ako sa mga under payments ng customers ng company. Pero nagtataka lang ako kung bakit pa sila nag issue ng demand letter saken? May company lawyer po sila at siguradong naiconsulta nila yun. Please enlighten me on my situation. Maraming salamat po sa mga sasagot.

#12282 rocco69

rocco69

    Player

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts

Posted 10 July 2019 - 08:13 AM

Company owned by Aussie, I had to do OT for 3-4 months, bayad naman ako ng overtime pero hindi ako binayaran ng night differentials as well as proper weekend rates. Last APE before I joined the company I was clear of any diagnosis, netong APE lang nung huli, nakitaan ako PTB and it's positive na meron nga. I'm thinking of filing my resignation narin, just wondering if I file a case against my employer who is a racist actually and generalizes filipino's work ethics kahit na sandmakmak trabaho mo and kahit hindi mo na trabaho, he still thinks wala kang ginagawa, what case would it be and how much would it cost versus how much would I be getting from them.

Note: I believe nakuha ko yung PTB dahil sa mga OT ko, every week there's a day or two na wala akong tulog ni konting minuto.

1. if I file a case against my employer... what case would it be and how much would it cost versus how much would I be getting from them.

 

Case:

Non-payment of night shift differential (additional 10% of hourly rate for work performed from 10pm - 6am) and non-payment of premium pay (additional 30% of regular pay, for work performed on rest day. in other words, you're supposed to be paid 130% of your salary for work performed on rest days)

 

Cost:

You file this with the National Labor Relations Commission. The Public Attorney's Office has a liaison office at the NLRC, and they help complainants for free. Or you can get your own lawyer (fees vary from lawyer to lawyer). Just compute how much night shift differential and premium pay you were not paid, and that's the sum you're entitled to. Then compare the amount to the cost of a private lawyer.

 

Notes:

1. The fact that your employer is a racist, if the same does not result to discrimination against you in terms of salary or other benefits, is not a ground for a labor case. It may be a ground for a civil case (but the cost of hiring a lawyer vis-a-vis the damages you might be awarded, plus the length of time and work involved might make this an unattractive option. Note also that you will be needing concrete proof of his racism, which might be a bit hard to procure also).

 

2. PTB is caused by a bacteria. While overwork might have led to a weakened immune system, PTB is not DIRECTLY caused by overwork. More, an employer is actually allowed to require employees to work overtime or on rest days when the same is required by the circumstances (as long as he is paid the required overtime and premium pay). In other words, you may have a hard time connecting your PTB to your employer. And even if the same was caused by your overtime, the law says that you go against the Workmen's Compensation Fund (administered by the Employee's Compensation Commission) rather than your employer. If you are covered by SSS, you file for compensation, due to your PTB, with the SSS. Ypou don't file this against your employer.

 

3. If you are a permanent employee, resignation will disqualify you for separation pay ( an employee who resigns is not entitled to separation pay). On the other hand, an employer may terminate an employee due to a disease which is prejudicial to his and his co-workers' health, bu thtey have to pay him separation pay.


Edited by rocco69, 10 July 2019 - 08:14 AM.


#12283 rocco69

rocco69

    Player

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts

Posted 10 July 2019 - 08:25 AM

Sales person po ako sa isang company. Naterminate po ako last april. Last June nakatanggap po ako ng demand letter galing sa company. Sinisingil nila saken yung mga short payments ng customers ko.

Ang tanong ko po, pwede po b nila ako kasuhan dahil sa short payments ng customers? Nireview ko yung employment contract ko at wala nman nakalagay na may liability ako sa mga under payments ng customers ng company. Pero nagtataka lang ako kung bakit pa sila nag issue ng demand letter saken? May company lawyer po sila at siguradong naiconsulta nila yun. Please enlighten me on my situation. Maraming salamat po sa mga sasagot.

Baka naman lumalabas sa records ng company na fully paid na yung customer, pero kulang ang ni-remit mo. In other words, baka akala nila, binulsa mo yung pera.

 

Dahil kung kulang ang bayad ng customer, ANG CUSTOMER DAPAT ANG MAGBABAYAD NUN, hindi ang sales personnel. Sales personnel are not, as a general rule, guarantors of customer's payments.

 

Kung tutoo na kulang ang bayad ng customer (at alam ito ng employer mo ng ni-release ang item), at wala kang inakong responsibildad sa pagbayad nung kulang, wala kang dapat sagutin dun.

 

Kung kulang ang bayad ng customer (at alam ito ng employer mo ng ni-release ang item) pero ginarantiyahan mo na ikaw ang magbabayad kung hindi makababayad ang customer, may sagutin ka.

 

Ngayon, kung kulang ang bayad ng customer at itinago mo ito sa employer mo (pinalabas mo na fully paid na), kung kaya't ni-release ang item dahil akala nila fully paid na, ito ay maaaring estafa o theft at may sagutin ka dito.

 

Kung binayaran ng buo ng customer yung item, pero binulsa mo ang bahagi, pagnanakaw naman yun, at may pananagutan ka rin.



#12284 kulkawal

kulkawal

    Experienced

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts

Posted 10 July 2019 - 12:28 PM

Baka naman lumalabas sa records ng company na fully paid na yung customer, pero kulang ang ni-remit mo. In other words, baka akala nila, binulsa mo yung pera.
 
Dahil kung kulang ang bayad ng customer, ANG CUSTOMER DAPAT ANG MAGBABAYAD NUN, hindi ang sales personnel. Sales personnel are not, as a general rule, guarantors of customer's payments.
 
Kung tutoo na kulang ang bayad ng customer (at alam ito ng employer mo ng ni-release ang item), at wala kang inakong responsibildad sa pagbayad nung kulang, wala kang dapat sagutin dun.
 
Kung kulang ang bayad ng customer (at alam ito ng employer mo ng ni-release ang item) pero ginarantiyahan mo na ikaw ang magbabayad kung hindi makababayad ang customer, may sagutin ka.
 
Ngayon, kung kulang ang bayad ng customer at itinago mo ito sa employer mo (pinalabas mo na fully paid na), kung kaya't ni-release ang item dahil akala nila fully paid na, ito ay maaaring estafa o theft at may sagutin ka dito.
 
Kung binayaran ng buo ng customer yung item, pero binulsa mo ang bahagi, pagnanakaw naman yun, at may pananagutan ka rin.


Maraming salamat po sa matiyagang pagpaliwanag atty.
Just to clarify po, yung mga short payments ng customers matagal na po nmen sinisingil sa customers even when I was still connected pa po sa company. Ang sistema po kc, may credit line ang mga customers kaya nirerelease nman po ng company ang items kahit wala pang bayad basta nagdaan na po ito sa proseso ng paggawa ng Sales Order kung saan inaaprubahan po ito ng may ari ng company.

Yung sinisingil po saken ay pinagsama samang short payment ng mga customers. Ang karamihan po sa dahilan ng short payment ng customer is because of COD discount. Where in papasok po sa COD price ang item pag nabayaran ng customer hanggang 7 days maximum. May iba pong customer na magbbayad ng COD price pero nakatawid na sa 7 days (merong nag 8 days 9 and so on..) pag lumagpas po ng 7 days, automatic na itong icocompute ng accounting bilang term price (30days).

May collector nman po kme, hindi po tlaga ako ang nangongollection. Kung may customer man na magbigay saken ng cheke, ito ay nakapangalan po sa company. Sigurado nman po akong walang customer na magssbe sa kanila na nagbayad saken na nakapangalan saken or pay to cash.

Hindi lang po talaga ako makapaniwala na nag issue sila ng demand letter saken na sa akin sinisingil ang mga under payments ng customers gayong hindi nman po ako ang kumuha at nakinabang sa mga produkto.

#12285 rocco69

rocco69

    Player

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts

Posted 16 July 2019 - 08:51 PM

Maraming salamat po sa matiyagang pagpaliwanag atty.
Just to clarify po, yung mga short payments ng customers matagal na po nmen sinisingil sa customers even when I was still connected pa po sa company. Ang sistema po kc, may credit line ang mga customers kaya nirerelease nman po ng company ang items kahit wala pang bayad basta nagdaan na po ito sa proseso ng paggawa ng Sales Order kung saan inaaprubahan po ito ng may ari ng company.

Yung sinisingil po saken ay pinagsama samang short payment ng mga customers. Ang karamihan po sa dahilan ng short payment ng customer is because of COD discount. Where in papasok po sa COD price ang item pag nabayaran ng customer hanggang 7 days maximum. May iba pong customer na magbbayad ng COD price pero nakatawid na sa 7 days (merong nag 8 days 9 and so on..) pag lumagpas po ng 7 days, automatic na itong icocompute ng accounting bilang term price (30days).

May collector nman po kme, hindi po tlaga ako ang nangongollection. Kung may customer man na magbigay saken ng cheke, ito ay nakapangalan po sa company. Sigurado nman po akong walang customer na magssbe sa kanila na nagbayad saken na nakapangalan saken or pay to cash.

Hindi lang po talaga ako makapaniwala na nag issue sila ng demand letter saken na sa akin sinisingil ang mga under payments ng customers gayong hindi nman po ako ang kumuha at nakinabang sa mga produkto.

kung ganyan ang talagang nangyari, lumalabas na wala sila sa tama sa pagsisingil sa iyo.

 

maaari mong sagutin yung sulat at ilahad ng panig mo (pero maganda, abugado rin ang gumawa, at baka may masabi ka pang hindi tama). maaari din namang balewalain mo na lang ang sulat, at hintayin kung ano ang sunod nilang hakbang.



#12286 wildswans

wildswans

    Cutie

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 235 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 July 2019 - 07:22 PM

Hi there. Just got two quick questions:

 

1. A company from China have offices here in the Philippines and they are doing the hiring locally. They only hire applicants as Freelance. They are requiring the Freelance to finish a training at a specific date saying that it is mandated by the Chinese government. Is that legal? Because it seems that they are treating the freelance as under the Chinese government which clearly they aren't because they are Filipinos and are residing in the Philippines.

 

2. If a guy is trying to pissed you off by making "parinig". Then if you retaliate by doing the same thing to him until he got pissed and challenged you to a fist fight and without saying anything you punch him in the face. Will you be held liable or him for starting the fight by making parinig? In that situation, is it better to wait for the guy to get physical first then just beat him up after making the first move?

 

Thanks in advance.



#12287 rocco69

rocco69

    Player

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts

Posted 27 July 2019 - 10:36 PM

Hi there. Just got two quick questions:

 

1. A company from China have offices here in the Philippines and they are doing the hiring locally. They only hire applicants as Freelance. They are requiring the Freelance to finish a training at a specific date saying that it is mandated by the Chinese government. Is that legal? Because it seems that they are treating the freelance as under the Chinese government which clearly they aren't because they are Filipinos and are residing in the Philippines.

 

2. If a guy is trying to pissed you off by making "parinig". Then if you retaliate by doing the same thing to him until he got pissed and challenged you to a fist fight and without saying anything you punch him in the face. Will you be held liable or him for starting the fight by making parinig? In that situation, is it better to wait for the guy to get physical first then just beat him up after making the first move?

 

Thanks in advance.

1. Is that legal?

 

without knowing the nature of the work they are performing, mahirap magsalita kung legal nga ba ang kunin sila bilang freelancer lamang.

 

2. Will you be held liable or him for starting the fight by making parinig? No. Making "parinig" is not a sufficient reason for punching someone. It will only lessen your criminal liability, but you will still be guilty of a crime (most probably less serious physical injuries)

 

In that situation, is it better to wait for the guy to get physical first then just beat him up after making the first move? If they get physical first, then you beat them up, you will still be liable. Their making the 1st move is actually a valid excuse for DEFENDING YOURSELF, but it does not justify beating them up. Defending yourself is allowed, but beating up a person is no longer defending yourself.



#12288 wildswans

wildswans

    Cutie

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 235 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 July 2019 - 01:21 PM

1. Is that legal?

 

without knowing the nature of the work they are performing, mahirap magsalita kung legal nga ba ang kunin sila bilang freelancer lamang.

 

 

 

Hi Sir. Thank you for the response. They are hired as freelance online English teachers. They teach English to Chinese students in China. The company has physical offices in the Philippines so I guess they are registered and under the jurisdiction of the Philippine law. However, since they should be under the Philippine law, can they tell the Filipino teachers, "you need to complete this online training on or before this date as MANDATED BY THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT"? Can they use the clause "as mandated by the Chinese government" when the teachers are all working in the Philippines or must obey Philippine law?



#12289 wildswans

wildswans

    Cutie

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 235 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 July 2019 - 12:06 AM

1. Is that legal?

 

without knowing the nature of the work they are performing, mahirap magsalita kung legal nga ba ang kunin sila bilang freelancer lamang.

 

 

EDITED (I edited the above post since I posted the wrong info): 

 

Hi Sir. Thank you for the response. They are hired as freelance home-based online English teachers. They teach English to Chinese students in China. The company has physical offices in the Philippines so I guess they are locally registered and under the jurisdiction of the Philippine law. Since they should be under the Philippine law, can they tell the Filipino teachers, "all freelance or independent home-based online teachers are required to take this training as MANDATED BY THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT"? Can they use the clause "as mandated by the Chinese government" when the teachers are all Filipinos and working in the Philippines or must obey Philippine law?



#12290 rocco69

rocco69

    Player

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts

Posted 30 July 2019 - 08:33 PM

 

EDITED (I edited the above post since I posted the wrong info): 

 

Hi Sir. Thank you for the response. They are hired as freelance home-based online English teachers. They teach English to Chinese students in China. The company has physical offices in the Philippines so I guess they are locally registered and under the jurisdiction of the Philippine law. Since they should be under the Philippine law, can they tell the Filipino teachers, "all freelance or independent home-based online teachers are required to take this training as MANDATED BY THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT"? Can they use the clause "as mandated by the Chinese government" when the teachers are all Filipinos and working in the Philippines or must obey Philippine law?

Can they use the clause "as mandated by the Chinese government" when the teachers are all Filipinos and working in the Philippines or must obey Philippine law?

 

Yes. They are teaching to Chinese students in China. While the terms of their employment is governed by Philippine law, what they are going to teach is covered by requirements of Chinese law. Accordingly, their employer may require them to take up training, as mandated by the Chinese government.

 

It is no different with a Filipino worker working in a Filipino factory, producing goods for export to the US. The Filipino worker may be required to produce items that are compliant with American standards, and he cannot refuse to do so, and insist that Philippine standards should be followed, on the ground that the item is being produced here in the Philippines.

 

The important thing is that the free-lancer receive the compensation and benefits guaranteed him under Philippine law. To require him to undertake trainings required by the Chinese government, as long as the content of the training is not illegal, contrary to public policy, morals, and good customs; would not be a violation.



#12291 mikemurphy0305

mikemurphy0305

    Hottie

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 301 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:PARANAQUE CITY

Posted 02 August 2019 - 08:40 AM

question lang po atty. meron akong kaibigan na ginawan ng simple renovation. went well sa first( this is just a labor contract for renovation and supply and install for cabinets) but nung na deliver ko na ung cabinets ayaw ng mgbayad ng billing ko and ayaw i release ung mga gamit ko na hindi na gagamitin sa site dhl kelangan ko na gamitin sa ibang site. wala kming document ng any kind as a contract. they are now threatening me cause i pulled out ung gagawa dhl sa non payment

question ko is how can i get my tools na hindi n gagamitin dhl ayaw nila i release

second is should i file a case against them for non payment since items were delivered and renovation works is almost completed.


thanks atty

#12292 rocco69

rocco69

    Player

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts

Posted 02 August 2019 - 07:14 PM

question lang po atty. meron akong kaibigan na ginawan ng simple renovation. went well sa first( this is just a labor contract for renovation and supply and install for cabinets) but nung na deliver ko na ung cabinets ayaw ng mgbayad ng billing ko and ayaw i release ung mga gamit ko na hindi na gagamitin sa site dhl kelangan ko na gamitin sa ibang site. wala kming document ng any kind as a contract. they are now threatening me cause i pulled out ung gagawa dhl sa non payment

question ko is how can i get my tools na hindi n gagamitin dhl ayaw nila i release

second is should i file a case against them for non payment since items were delivered and renovation works is almost completed.


thanks atty

1. question ko is how can i get my tools na hindi n gagamitin dhl ayaw nila i release

 

dalhin mo sa barangay.

 

2. should i file a case against them for non payment since items were delivered and renovation works is almost completed.

 

isama mo sa reklamo mo sa barangay yung di ka binayaran ng tama. kung di kayo magkasundo sa barangay, pwede ka na maghain ng reklamo (ang tanong: magkano ang hinahabol mo, baka kasi maliit lang, pwede mo na dalhin sa Small Claims Court. Kahit walang kontrata, magiging ebidensya ang mga Salaysay ng mga trabahador mo (pagawin mo ng salaysay) tungkol sa ginawang renovation (maging leksyon din sa iyo ito... sa susunod, kailangan may kasulatan, para di ka nahihirapan patunayan ang mga claim mo)


Edited by rocco69, 02 August 2019 - 07:15 PM.


#12293 mikemurphy0305

mikemurphy0305

    Hottie

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 301 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:PARANAQUE CITY

Posted 02 August 2019 - 08:18 PM

maliit lng nman 60k lng atty. ang concern ko is ung mga gamit ko na ayaw i release

#12294 wildswans

wildswans

    Cutie

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 235 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 28 August 2019 - 11:39 PM

Good day po Sir. If a lease contract is about to expire and the lessee said that he vacated the unit already with his things but the security of the building said that there are still some belongings left. What if, the lessee didn't remove all of his belongings at the end of the contract even after reminding him a day or two before the contract ends to remove all his belongings. Can we remove the belongings ourselves and just leave it at security for him to pick up at a later time? Is that legal? What's the best way to deal with this? It would be a hassle to clean the unit if the belongings are still there and more so if someone wants to occupy the unit already.



#12295 rocco69

rocco69

    Player

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts

Posted 29 August 2019 - 01:51 AM

Good day po Sir. If a lease contract is about to expire and the lessee said that he vacated the unit already with his things but the security of the building said that there are still some belongings left. What if, the lessee didn't remove all of his belongings at the end of the contract even after reminding him a day or two before the contract ends to remove all his belongings. Can we remove the belongings ourselves and just leave it at security for him to pick up at a later time? Is that legal? What's the best way to deal with this? It would be a hassle to clean the unit if the belongings are still there and more so if someone wants to occupy the unit already.

call up/inform the lessee that there are still belongings there and then give him a reasonable period w/in which to remove, and that failure to do so within the period given will result in all property left being deposited with the security for him to pick up.

 

Have someone from the barangay (if possible)  witness the removal of the things (make an inventory of the things removed, to be signed by you an the witness)



#12296 charliehouse

charliehouse

    Charmer

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 467 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 September 2019 - 07:57 AM

In the light sa ongoing issue ngayon na paglaya ni Sanchez, i've read several articles na nagsasabing ang isang convict ay may civil punishment rin civil interdiction yata ang tawag kung saan hindi siya pwedeng bumoto o gumawa ng kontrata.

Tanong lang sir for curiousity lang, kung makakalaya ba ang isang bilanggo, automatic ba na mawawala ang civil interdiction?

Kung makakalaya si Sanchez according to GCTA, pwede na ba siyang bumoto at gumawa ng kontrata agad-agad?

#12297 Mc Travis

Mc Travis

    Virgin

  • (04) Casual
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 September 2019 - 09:05 PM

In the light sa ongoing issue ngayon na paglaya ni Sanchez, i've read several articles na nagsasabing ang isang convict ay may civil punishment rin civil interdiction yata ang tawag kung saan hindi siya pwedeng bumoto o gumawa ng kontrata.
Tanong lang sir for curiousity lang, kung makakalaya ba ang isang bilanggo, automatic ba na mawawala ang civil interdiction?
Kung makakalaya si Sanchez according to GCTA, pwede na ba siyang bumoto at gumawa ng kontrata agad-agad?

Ang civil interdiction ay isang Accessory Penalty naka kabit ito sa, as the term suggests, Principal penalty. Mawawala ito oras na ma-extinguish ang kanyang Criminal liability. Kaya't oras na makalaya ang isang tao sa pagkakabilanggo sa mga dahilan tulad ng service of sentence, extinguished na ang kanyang Criminal liability sa parehong Principal at accessory penalties.

Maga-apply ba ito kay Sanchez? Questionable pa kasi kung applicable ba talaga sa kanya ang GCTA. May mga bumabasa ng batas at nagiinterpret na hindi applicable ang GCTA sa persons convicted of heinous crimes. May mga nagsasabi ding applicable sa lahat ang GCTA. SC lang ang makakapag sabi.

Kung applicable, para sa akin, wala nang civil interdiction dahil fully extinguished na ang criminal liability. Kung hindi applicable, may tanong pa diyan kung pwede pa ba siyang arestuhin o ikulong. Maari man o hindi na, magpapatuloy pa din ang civil interdiction.

#12298 oliverjohnholmes

oliverjohnholmes

    gemini man

  • (04) Casual
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 198 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:it's the journey...

Posted 20 September 2019 - 04:39 AM

good sirs, eto tanong lang. ano po ba ang legal age of consent sa pinas?



#12299 rocco69

rocco69

    Player

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts

Posted 23 September 2019 - 01:02 PM

good sirs, eto tanong lang. ano po ba ang legal age of consent sa pinas?

Kung gusto mong magibg kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 years old a



#12300 rocco69

rocco69

    Player

  • (05) Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 908 posts

Posted 23 September 2019 - 01:33 PM

Kung gusto mong magibg kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 years old a

good sirs, eto tanong lang. ano po ba ang legal age of consent sa pinas?

Kung gusto mong maging kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 YEARS OLD ANG AGE OF CONSENT SA PILIPINAS!

 

Ito rin ang makikita mo kapag iyo itong hinanap sa Google.

 

NGUNIT, SUBALIT, DATAPWAT...

 

Ito ay isang simplistikong pag-aaral ng batas, base lamang sa pagbabasa ng Republic Act 8353 (na di na isinalang-alang at inalala ang iba pang batas na may kaugnayan dito!).

 

Ayon sa RA 8353:

 

Article 266-A. Rape: When And How Committed. - Rape is committed:

"1) By a man who shall have carnal knowledge of a woman under any of the following circumstances:

"a) Through force, threat, or intimidation;

"b) When the offended party is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious;

"c) By means of fraudulent machination or grave abuse of authority; and

"d) When the offended party is under twelve (12) years of age or is demented, even though none of the circumstances mentioned above be present.

 

Dahil sinasabi sa RA 8353 na kapag ang offended party ay below 12 yrs, rape na, kahit wala yung ibang bagay bagay na kailangan para sa rape, IBIG DAW SABIHIN, 12 nga ang edad para legal nang makipagsiping ang isang babae sa lalaki.

 

Ating alalahanin na ang edad ng hustong gulang sa Pilipinas ay 18 (RA 6809). Dahil dito, ipinapalagay ng batas na walang kapangyarihan magdesisyon para sa sarili niya ang menor-de-edad.

 

Ayon din sa RA 7610:

 

Section 5. Child Prostitution and Other Sexual Abuse.Children, whether male or female, who for money, profit, or any other consideration or due to the coercion or influence of any adult, syndicate or group, indulge in sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct, are deemed to be children exploited in prostitution and other sexual abuse.

The penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium period to reclusion perpetua shall be imposed xxx   xxx   xxx

 

Sa madaling salita, ang batang nakipagtalik dahil sa impluwensya ng isang nasa hustong gulang ay ipinapalagay na "child exploited in other sexual abuse," at maaaring masentesyahan ang nasa hustong gulang ng reclusion temporal medium hanggang reclusion perpetua (14 years, 8 months and 1 day to 30 years).

 

 

Hiwalay pa dito ang Article 337 at 338 ng Revised Penal Code:

 

 

Art. 337. Qualified seduction. — The seduction of a virgin over twelve years and under eighteen years of age, committed by any person in public authority, priest, home-servant, domestic, guardian, teacher, or any person who, in any capacity, shall be entrusted with the education or custody of the woman seduced, shall be punished by prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods.

The penalty next higher in degree shall be imposed upon any person who shall seduce his sister or descendant, whether or not she be a virgin or over eighteen years of age.chanrobles virtual law library

Under the provisions of this Chapter, seduction is committed when the offender has carnal knowledge of any of the persons and under the circumstances described herein.chanrobles virtual law library

 

(Ang ibig sabihin ng salitang "virgin" sa Art. 337 ay babaeng maganda/malinis ang reputasyon, hindi na ito ay literal na "birhen")

 

 

Art. 338. Simple seduction. — The seduction of a woman who is single or a widow of good reputation, over twelve but under eighteen years of age, committed by means of deceit, shall be punished by arresto mayor.chanrobles vi

 

Makikita mula sa Art. 337 at 338 na krimen pa rin ang pakikipagtalik sa babeng nasa edad 12 hanggang bago mag-18.

 

Alalahanin din na rape ang pag-aabuso ng kapangyarihan para makatalik ang isang babae (see Art. 266-A[c])

 

Maari mong gawing depensa na PUMAYAG AT WALANG PAMIMILIT ANG PAKIKIPAGTALIK MO SA BABAENG EDAD 12 - BELOW 18.

Pero, dahil wala pa nga itong kapasidad na magpasya para sa sarili (wala pa siya sa hustong gulang), pag gusto ng magulang magkaso ng rape, YARI KA!!! Dahil  walang bisa ang pagpayag nung babae (wala nga siyang kapasidad na magpasya pa). Palalabasin ng magulang na ang pakikipagtalik ay dahil sa impluwensya nung nasa edad, at presto... ito ay child exploited under other forms of sexual abuse na. YARI!!!

 

 

Kung kaya't masasabi natin na HINDI 12 ANG LEGAL AGE OF CONSENT SA PILIPINAS. ITO AY 18!!!

 

rtual law libry


Edited by rocco69, 23 September 2019 - 01:34 PM.

  • oliverjohnholmes likes this




3 user(s) are reading this topic

1 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users


    sw0rdf1sh