Jump to content

The End of the American Century?


Recommended Posts

Just to give you an idea how rich the USA is. 10% of the US population make $100,000 or more per year. It means that there are 25 million Americans who make $100,000 or more a year. This may change in the future, but still, this statistics illustrates the wealth of Americans.

Link to comment

Btw, China also owes Americans money in the form of investments in Chinese public stocks. Hong Kong and Shanghai have stock exchanges where foreigners trade Chinese stocks. It's a global economy nowadays. Check on the stockholders of Chinese publicly traded companies and you will find that a lot of them have a lot of American holding companies as major investors. Also, look at Taiwan and Japan stock exchange company info - lots of American holding companies as stockholders.

Link to comment

This is mainly a misconception when a foreign country buys Treasuries from the US. The country that 'sells' treasury notes is still in control and market forces still dictate the prices; also, no country can just turn treasury notes into cash and get the same price. Assuming China sells 1 trillion dollars in notes, China will be lucky to even get half of that in cash today due to market forces. And, if China gets cash for it, what does it do with the cash? Do they reinvest it in another note with the same level of security as a US Treasury Note? Or, do they leave it in a vault until it depreciates? China would be better off waiting for the notes to mature than to sell it. The US has a lot of debt but a big amount of that is also local debt - meaning the US government will pay the debt to private American citizens. Also, the US is one of the countries that a lot of money saved by private citizens for their retirement - very few countries have this. American private citizens have several trillion dollars in retirement savings. Rigged credit ratings?!! If it is rigged, so why is there a market correction right now? Remember, there are 250 million Americans in the land mass of USA while there are 1.2 billion Chinese in the same amount of land mass. Who do you think will go hungry first? The Chinese were even lucky to put money in US Treasury notes coz if they didn't they would have ended up like the Middle East financiers which put their money in risky stocks and securities. I work in the US mutual fund industry, and 1 trillion dollars can be represented by one American mutual fund company. There are hundreds of American mutual fund companies. What it means, is that 1 trillion dollars is readily available from American private citizens. Just a twist, this 1 trillion dollars in private American citizen's money is invested around the world. Do you get the picture? The problem of the US government right now is simply big government spending and they are trying to make it reasonable by cutting down on the bureaucracy - what it mean is less government employees and less spending. So, if the US government is able to cut down size, the problem is solved. Cutting down the size of US government is a hard task since the country is used to big spending. If it was food, there is no problem in the US. People get fatter in a recession coz government still gives free food. Homeless people in the US can still eat at McDonald's everyday and still have money for cigarettes and alcohol courtesy of the US government.

 

Stop the doomsday scenario. If you haven't been to a First World country, like Japan, US or Europe, you likely don't have a good picture of what wealth means and how it works. Also, the US has already seen the worst of a financial crisis of the century, the Great Depression. This recession is not even close to that.

 

Very nice opinion Master Kidpoker. Very balanced argument. US will remain dominant within the next 100 or years, let's just accept that.

Link to comment

This is mainly a misconception when a foreign country buys Treasuries from the US. The country that 'sells' treasury notes is still in control and market forces still dictate the prices; also, no country can just turn treasury notes into cash and get the same price. Assuming China sells 1 trillion dollars in notes, China will be lucky to even get half of that in cash today due to market forces. And, if China gets cash for it, what does it do with the cash? Do they reinvest it in another note with the same level of security as a US Treasury Note? Or, do they leave it in a vault until it depreciates? China would be better off waiting for the notes to mature than to sell it. The US has a lot of debt but a big amount of that is also local debt - meaning the US government will pay the debt to private American citizens. Also, the US is one of the countries that a lot of money saved by private citizens for their retirement - very few countries have this. American private citizens have several trillion dollars in retirement savings. Rigged credit ratings?!! If it is rigged, so why is there a market correction right now? Remember, there are 250 million Americans in the land mass of USA while there are 1.2 billion Chinese in the same amount of land mass. Who do you think will go hungry first? The Chinese were even lucky to put money in US Treasury notes coz if they didn't they would have ended up like the Middle East financiers which put their money in risky stocks and securities. I work in the US mutual fund industry, and 1 trillion dollars can be represented by one American mutual fund company. There are hundreds of American mutual fund companies. What it means, is that 1 trillion dollars is readily available from American private citizens. Just a twist, this 1 trillion dollars in private American citizen's money is invested around the world. Do you get the picture? The problem of the US government right now is simply big government spending and they are trying to make it reasonable by cutting down on the bureaucracy - what it mean is less government employees and less spending. So, if the US government is able to cut down size, the problem is solved. Cutting down the size of US government is a hard task since the country is used to big spending. If it was food, there is no problem in the US. People get fatter in a recession coz government still gives free food. Homeless people in the US can still eat at McDonald's everyday and still have money for cigarettes and alcohol courtesy of the US government.

 

Stop the doomsday scenario. If you haven't been to a First World country, like Japan, US or Europe, you likely don't have a good picture of what wealth means and how it works. Also, the US has already seen the worst of a financial crisis of the century, the Great Depression. This recession is not even close to that.

 

Your first point is self-contradictory because you argue that the U.S. is in control but market forces determine the value of what they lend. On top of that, you forgot to mention that each time the U.S. gets fewer cents for every dollar that it borrows due to mounting debt.

 

You don't know anything about rigged credit ratings? How do you think those investments that led to the 2008 crash received high ratings?

The problem isn't just a "big government" but increased total borrowing and spending across all sectors. The bigger problem is U.S. banks exposed to over $370 trillion in unregulated derivatives, part of a global market made up of more than a quadrillion dollars. It was some of those derivatives that led to the 2008 crash, and it's similar to that trillion dollars leveraged many times around the world. So, you see, I do get the "bigger picture."

 

Your last point is contradictory: you want to cut down the size of the government but you also want the government to give "free food."

 

What will likely happen is that one credit crunch will follow another, with government and banks attempting to thwart that with QE3, QE4, and more, meanwhile receiving fewer cents for every dollar borrowed. Oil prices will go up each time energy demand hits production ceiling, as global oil production has remained flat since 2006 and oil discoveries peaked in 1964. Ultimately, it's that type of problem--a resource crunch--that will make economic crisis look like a walk in the park.

Link to comment

Just to give you an idea how rich the USA is. 10% of the US population make $100,000 or more per year. It means that there are 25 million Americans who make $100,000 or more a year. This may change in the future, but still, this statistics illustrates the wealth of Americans.

 

"The Middle Class in America Is Radically Shrinking. Here Are the Stats to Prove it"

 

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/the-u.s.-middle-class-is-being-wiped-out-here's-the-stats-to-prove-it-520657.html?tickers=^DJI,^GSPC,SPY,MCD,WMT,XRT,DIA

Link to comment

Btw, China also owes Americans money in the form of investments in Chinese public stocks. Hong Kong and Shanghai have stock exchanges where foreigners trade Chinese stocks. It's a global economy nowadays. Check on the stockholders of Chinese publicly traded companies and you will find that a lot of them have a lot of American holding companies as major investors. Also, look at Taiwan and Japan stock exchange company info - lots of American holding companies as stockholders.

 

Much of the wealth is not controlled by "Americans" but by only around 1 pct of U.S. citizens. The same takes place in other parts of the world. In general, only a very small number of people control much of the wealth of the world.

Link to comment

Very nice opinion Master Kidpoker. Very balanced argument. US will remain dominant within the next 100 or years, let's just accept that.

 

"The Decline and Fall of the American Empire"

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/12/05/opinion/main7121029.shtml

 

which includes a reference to a 2008 report from the National Intelligence Council. The group anticipates a "soft landing," though.

 

The more significant problem, of course, is the energy needed to maintain global economic growth. See the thread about peak oil for details.

Link to comment

Much of the wealth is not controlled by "Americans" but by only around 1 pct of U.S. citizens. The same takes place in other parts of the world. In general, only a very small number of people control much of the wealth of the world.

 

False. My access ako sa US global securities trading kaya alam ko.

Link to comment

"The Decline and Fall of the American Empire"

 

http://www.cbsnews.c...in7121029.shtml

 

which includes a reference to a 2008 report from the National Intelligence Council. The group anticipates a "soft landing," though.

 

The more significant problem, of course, is the energy needed to maintain global economic growth. See the thread about peak oil for details.

 

That was written by a history professor and not an economics professor.

Link to comment

Your first point is self-contradictory because you argue that the U.S. is in control but market forces determine the value of what they lend. On top of that, you forgot to mention that each time the U.S. gets fewer cents for every dollar that it borrows due to mounting debt.

 

You don't know anything about rigged credit ratings? How do you think those investments that led to the 2008 crash received high ratings?

The problem isn't just a "big government" but increased total borrowing and spending across all sectors. The bigger problem is U.S. banks exposed to over $370 trillion in unregulated derivatives, part of a global market made up of more than a quadrillion dollars. It was some of those derivatives that led to the 2008 crash, and it's similar to that trillion dollars leveraged many times around the world. So, you see, I do get the "bigger picture."

 

Your last point is contradictory: you want to cut down the size of the government but you also want the government to give "free food."

 

What will likely happen is that one credit crunch will follow another, with government and banks attempting to thwart that with QE3, QE4, and more, meanwhile receiving fewer cents for every dollar borrowed. Oil prices will go up each time energy demand hits production ceiling, as global oil production has remained flat since 2006 and oil discoveries peaked in 1964. Ultimately, it's that type of problem--a resource crunch--that will make economic crisis look like a walk in the park.

 

The 2008 crash was caused by 'toxic assets'. Toxic assets are mortgage based securities/derivatives with extremely high risk; it was extremely high risk because the banks lent money to people who do not have good credit and the housing market was highly inflated (real estate bubble). The derivatives failed because those derivatives are built from extremely high risk mortgage. Also, the insurers of these derivatives underestimated the risk and are unable to pay for the insured amount when the massive failures happened. That in turn caused the failure of several US banks and financial insurers such as Lehman Brothers and the American Insurance Group (AIG).

 

Most of the funding for these mortgages are not from the US government but from foreign and local fund holdings company. The US housing bubble was funded by money from abroad who thought the US housing market was stable before 2008. So, if they pushed a $1 million to the US housing market before 2008, by 2008, their money is only worth about $100,000 or less. That explains why many heads of funding companies committed suicide because they wouldn't be able to get their money back; they had not diversified their investments and was attracted by big potential profits in the US real estate market. It also explains the massive loses from the derivatives market. The loses in the derivatives market does not translate to debt. It only means that somebody lost money by betting on the wrong "horse".

 

You wouldn't need credit ratings anymore if your stock, derivatives or securities already went to bust. That's how market forces work.

 

The US is a First World country. Food is not a problem. Food is not considered big government spending.

 

Honestly, you have to read more macro economics, stock/derivatives trading, and fixed income books to understand the financial markets. I know it because I work in the financial markets industry.

Link to comment

Your first point is self-contradictory because you argue that the U.S. is in control but market forces determine the value of what they lend. On top of that, you forgot to mention that each time the U.S. gets fewer cents for every dollar that it borrows due to mounting debt.

 

You don't know anything about rigged credit ratings? How do you think those investments that led to the 2008 crash received high ratings?

The problem isn't just a "big government" but increased total borrowing and spending across all sectors. The bigger problem is U.S. banks exposed to over $370 trillion in unregulated derivatives, part of a global market made up of more than a quadrillion dollars. It was some of those derivatives that led to the 2008 crash, and it's similar to that trillion dollars leveraged many times around the world. So, you see, I do get the "bigger picture."

 

Your last point is contradictory: you want to cut down the size of the government but you also want the government to give "free food."

 

What will likely happen is that one credit crunch will follow another, with government and banks attempting to thwart that with QE3, QE4, and more, meanwhile receiving fewer cents for every dollar borrowed. Oil prices will go up each time energy demand hits production ceiling, as global oil production has remained flat since 2006 and oil discoveries peaked in 1964. Ultimately, it's that type of problem--a resource crunch--that will make economic crisis look like a walk in the park.

 

Just to add. Banks have gotten stricter now in lending money. In fact, it is hard to get credit nowadays. How can you have a credit crunch if banks are hardly lending?

Link to comment

This came out today:

 

http://business.inquirer.net/16593/us-stocks-pummeled-by-bleak-jobs-data

 

"Financial stocks took a severe pounding after The New York Times reported that US authorities would sue more than a dozen big banks over their peddling of mortgage-backed securities prior to the 2008 financial crisis."

 

This gives credence to accusations that Wall Street and US banks' excessive greed caused the 2008 financial crisis.

Link to comment

At least, they have a century of dominance.....their decline is more on massive liberal entitlements than being fiscally responsible.

 

They (US gov't) recently added 4 trillion dollars in deficit under the Obama administration, who can recover from that?

 

US government can just cut down on expenditures to fix it.

Link to comment

how can a country with the following collapse? i doubt it...

 

1. has the most advance tech and arms

2. controls oil in the middle east and has a large untapped deposit within their boundaries

3. has the largest virgin forest reserve

4. has the biggest gold reserve

5. prints the international currency

6. has the biggest international banks

7. one of the financers of the world bank

Link to comment

how can a country with the following collapse? i doubt it...

 

1. has the most advance tech and arms

2. controls oil in the middle east and has a large untapped deposit within their boundaries

3. has the largest virgin forest reserve

4. has the biggest gold reserve

5. prints the international currency

6. has the biggest international banks

7. one of the financers of the world bank

 

i think doomsayers are being influenced by the full moon.

Link to comment

how can a country with the following collapse? i doubt it...

 

1. has the most advance tech and arms

2. controls oil in the middle east and has a large untapped deposit within their boundaries

3. has the largest virgin forest reserve

4. has the biggest gold reserve

5. prints the international currency

6. has the biggest international banks

7. one of the financers of the world bank

 

 

Yes, an American collapse is possible. But only after all the other countries have collapsed.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...